Senate Overwhelmingly Approves Sex Trafficking Bill to Amend Section 230
The bill—which is expected to be signed into law by President Trump—would create new civil and criminal liability for internet companies.
March 21, 2018 at 05:47 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Senate on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved legislation amending Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to allow civil and criminal sex trafficking-related claims against internet companies, sending the bill to the White House.
The Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, or FOSTA (H.R. 1865), was approved in a vote of 97-2. The only lawmakers voting against the bill were Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden, who co-authored Section 230, and Kentucky Republican Rand Paul. Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, did not vote, although he supported the bill.
A proposed amendment by Wyden to help fund sex-trafficking enforcement was defeated. Wyden withdrew a separate proposed amendment that aimed to expressly shield internet companies from legal liability, if they actively moderated their forums.
President Donald Trump is expected to sign the bill into law. After the House approved H.R. 1865 at the end of February, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders called the legislation “an important step forward” in the fight against sex trafficking.
Critics of the bill, however, have said the legislation is vaguely worded and will not only be counterproductive—by forcing sex-trafficking operations further underground—but also hinder internet freedom by exposing companies to litigation over user content.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation said in a statement that, in the wake of the bill's passage, “online platforms will have little choice but to become much more restrictive in what sorts of discussion—and what sorts of users—they allow, censoring innocent people in the process.”
The bill expands existing criminal sex-trafficking law to rope in facilitation of trafficking by web sites. It also makes those provisions retroactive, which the Justice Department has said is probably unconstitutional.
Earlier drafts of the legislation were strongly opposed by the Internet Association, which represents companies including Google, Facebook, Twitter and Reddit. But the organization changed its position after tweaks were made.
In a tweet, Wyden took a shot at internet companies for not taking a stand against the bill. “We are in a fight for the Internet every day. Big Internet companies are NOT engaged in this fight – Their only interest is currying favor with the nations where they wish to do business,” he wrote.
The impetus for the legislation was Backpage.com, the online classified ad site that a Senate investigation found had “knowingly concealed” evidence of criminal sex trafficking through its site and facilitated child sex trafficking.
That investigation was led by Sens. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Claire McCaskill, D-Missouri, who championed the FOSTA bill and its earlier Senate version, called SESTA.
“Today's vote is a victory for trafficking survivors and a victory for our efforts to help stop the selling of women and children online,” Portman said in a statement, adding that the legislation “will ensure justice for trafficking victims and help us combat this evil crime.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Plaintiffs Seek to Avoid Jurisdiction Fight in IVF Case, Challenge CooperSurgical in Connecticut
4 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
Trending Stories
- 1Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 2Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 3Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
- 4Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
- 5Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250