SCOTUS Declines to Take Up Abortion Videos Case
The court declined to undo a San Francisco federal judge's injunction against Troy Newman, president of the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, and David Daleiden, founder of the anti-abortion group Center for Medical Progress.
April 02, 2018 at 09:49 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up an appeal in a closely watched abortion-related case coming out of the Ninth Circuit.
The high court declined to overturn an injunction against Troy Newman, president of the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, and David Daleiden, founder of the anti-abortion group Center for Medical Progress. The court denied review without comment.
Jay Sekulow, a lawyer for President Donald Trump and a veteran U.S. Supreme Court advocate, represented Newman in his cert petition.
Newman and Daleiden were sued by the National Abortion Federation for publicly releasing secret recordings of the federation's annual meetings and follow-up meetings with abortion providers.
The videos, which lawyers for the abortion federation claimed were manipulated to falsely portray the providers as sellers of fetal tissue, violated confidentiality agreements that members of CMP, using false names, signed in order to have access to the meetings, according to the suit.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick III, finding the contracts enforceable and breached, issued a preliminary injunction blocking release of the videos in 2016. The court rejected arguments by Newman and Daleiden that enforcing the contracts was an unconstitutional prior restraint under the First Amendment and that CMP had an interest in disclosing criminal wrongdoing.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the trial court. The appeals panel said the district court concluded “as a matter of fact” that CMP had not found evidence of criminal wrongdoing and “that determination is amply supported by the record.”
Because of the videos, nine states opened and then closed investigations of Planned Parenthood after finding no wrongdoing; 11 other states refused to pursue investigations based on CMP's accusations, according to the NAF's high court brief opposing review.
In addition to Newman, Daleiden, represented by Catherine Wynne Short of Ojai, California, filed a separate petition for review. Marc Hearron, an appellate partner at Morrison & Foerster, represents NAF in both cases.
Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law & Justice, is a familiar face in the high court. He has argued 12 cases involving speech and religion issues such as abortion clinic buffer zones, prayers before high school football games and religious monuments in public parks. He also has filed numerous amicus briefs.
In February, Sekulow filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court supporting the Trump administration's most recent iteration of its ban on certain foreign nationals entering the United States in Trump v. Hawaii.
Sekulow was not immediately reached for comment Monday.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute readStock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
Trending Stories
- 1Mediators for the Southern District of New York Honored at Eighth Annual James Duane Awards
- 2The Lawyers Picked by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Term
- 3Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
- 4Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
- 5Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250