Federal Law Enforcement Chiefs Outline White Collar Priorities Under Trump
At a Views from the Top panel discussion Wednesday night, the head of the local SEC, DOJ Antitrust Division, and U.S. Attorney's Offices said investigating and prosecuting economic crimes remains a priority under the Trump administration.
April 05, 2018 at 08:15 AM
4 minute read
The chiefs of three local federal law enforcement offices say their approach to charging and prosecuting white collar cases has changed little under the Trump administration.
Alex Tse, acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California, Jina Choi, director of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's San Francisco regional office, and Kate Patchen, chief of the Justice Department's Antitrust Division's San Francisco office, spoke Wednesday night as part of a Views from the Top panel discussion in the ceremonial courtroom of the San Francisco federal courthouse.
The program, presented by the Northern District of California Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, its Criminal Law Section and the Bar Association of San Francisco's Criminal Justice Section, usually occurs annually but went on hiatus last year during the transition between administrations.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who moderated Wednesday's panel as well as the most recent prior edition, quipped at the top of the program: “Welcome back to find out what your government is about to do to you.”
Although two of the faces were new—Tse took over for Brian Stretch earlier this year and Patchen for Marc Siegel in 2016—they had familiar themes. Choi, the lone holdover from the last panel, noted that the SEC during the past year has added two commissioners and a new chair, former Sullivan & Cromwell partner Jay Clayton.
“Our chairman has been very explicit about making sure we are out to protect the retail investor … 'Mr. and Mrs. 401(k),'” she said. Internally, she pointed out that the SEC now has a dedicated cyber unit with staff in San Francisco focusing on things such as trading on hacked information and manipulating the market via social media.
Patchen, meanwhile, said the bulk of the work of the 25-lawyer local antitrust office has been trial-related. The Antitrust Division, she said, tried a record nine trials nationwide last year, six of which were handled by the San Francisco office. The office tried six cases related to bid-rigging at foreclosure auctions in the wake of the recession, which resulted in nine of the 10 individuals charged being convicted.
Overall, the office has gotten convictions or guilty pleas from 84 investors as part of the investigation into widespread collusion among bidders to drive down prices at auctions across the Bay area. Patchen said her office has a “very narrow” mission to enforce the federal antitrust laws. “That mission doesn't change between administrations,” she said.
Tse took his brief opening remarks to introduce himself to the crowd. Tse, who served as Stretch's top assistant since 2016 and as the office's civil chief for three years prior to that, is about 90 days into a 210-day term as acting U.S. attorney. It will be up to the district court's chief judge to choose the U.S. attorney, unless the president nominates someone and the Senate confirms them. “There's no indication when that will happen,” Tse said.
Tse noted that audience members had no doubt read of the administration's and the DOJ's increased focus on violent crime, the opioid epidemic, and illegal immigration.
“Those are indeed priorities,” he said. “I'm here to tell you that white collar remains a priority. … Know that the U.S. Attorney's Office remains committed to prosecuting economic crime in all forms,” said Tse, pointing in particular to the ongoing fraud trial against Autonomy's former CFO.
When Alsup asked whether to expect the office to charge more illegal re-entry or marijuana cases, Tse said that was unlikely. The message he and other U.S. attorneys have been told by Main Justice, Tse said, is to know their district and their constituents.
Tse said that where marijuana cases overlap with violent crime and money laundering, they remain viable federal charges. But he also pointed out that U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions himself has said the department doesn't have the resources to charge routine marijuana cases.
Wednesday night's panel comes as The Recorder's colleagues at The American Lawyer reported federal prosecutions of white collar crime recently hit 20-year lows following the change in administrations. White collar prosecutions during the most recent fiscal year fell below 6,000 for the first time in two decades, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a research organization at Syracuse University. Year-over-year federal white-collar prosecutions were down 6.8 percent in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, 2017, according to the TRAC data.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readJust Ahead of Oral Argument, Fubo Settles Antitrust Case with Disney, Fox, Warner Bros.
Dena Sharp Will Take Over Girard Sharp in Firm's First Leadership Transition
4 minute read'Erroneous Assumption'?: Apple Challenges DOJ Antitrust Remedy in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250