In a Heller Ehrman Reunion, Orrick Partner David Goldstein Joins SF Boutique
David Goldstein, an antitrust and litigation partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in San Francisco, recently left to join several of his former Heller Ehrman colleagues at Farmer Brownstein Jaeger & Goldstein, a Bay Area-based boutique that now has his name on its shingle.
April 06, 2018 at 03:48 PM
4 minute read
Litigation and antitrust partner David Goldstein has left Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to rejoin several of his former Heller Ehrman colleagues at Farmer Brownstein Jaeger & Goldstein, a San Francisco-based boutique that has added his name to its shingle.
Goldstein and his co-worker David Brownstein joined Orrick in 2008 when Heller Ehrman's partners voted to dissolve the 118-year-old firm. Another of their partners, Charles “Chuck” Jaeger, was recruited to Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Three years after Heller Ehrman collapsed, Brownstein and Jaeger came together and joined William “Buck” Farmer to form a boutique law firm that specializes in antitrust and other complex business litigation. Since then, the group at the firm formerly known as Farmer Brownstein Jaeger has been trying to convince Goldstein to join.
“Having been in the large firm environment for almost 30 years, the pull of the invitation to work with two guys I had grown up with as a young lawyer until Heller folded in 2008 was too strong to resist. And Buck is wonderful. I had a great experience working with him in a price-fixing case, and I learned a lot from him,” said Goldstein. “So, it was more the pull of working here than just wanting to leave the Big Law firm environment. I was in large firms for almost 30 years, and the attraction of trying something different like this was very strong.”
Goldstein started working at the firm on Feb. 12. After working at big firms for most of his career, Goldstein said it has been a big transition for him, but he was excited to reunite with his former colleagues.
Goldstein has represented both defendants and plaintiffs in complex litigation in federal and state courts, as well as in arbitrations. For the past 20 years, much of his practice has focused on antitrust and competition matters involving cartels, dominant firms and monopoly cases.
“Most of my practice the past 15 years has been antitrust work, but commercial litigation has always been part of my work, and I greatly enjoy it,” said Goldstein. He expects to do more commercial litigation at the boutique.
With Goldstein joining the team, the firm currently has five partners, as well as an office manager, a legal assistant, and other contract lawyers as needed.
“We not only respect David a great deal as a lawyer because we practiced with him—he is a great friend of ours—but the other factor is that we are buried right now with work, and we need help,” Jaeger said.
Unlike big firms, Goldstein said his boutique does not offer the same administrative support. However, he said that is also an advantage since the boutique has less overhead costs and charges clients lower billing rates.
“What we are trying to do as a smaller firm—and I think this is probably true for lots of firms like ours—is that when we get hired, the partners do the work,” said Goldstein. “We don't usually work in teams of five, six or seven people, so we have very close relationships with clients. They really get our attention.”
The group said as of now they are comfortable with their current size. As more big firms are moving into California, increasing the competition in the market, their strategy is collaborating with the big firms instead of competing head-to-head with them.
“If the case has 50 or 100 million pieces of paper, and requires a squad of lawyers, we are not in competition with them,” Brownstein said. But, he added, there are plenty of cases that don't call for “a lot of associates, that can be handled very efficiently at [a] firm our size at sort of the partner level.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250