In a Heller Ehrman Reunion, Orrick Partner David Goldstein Joins SF Boutique
David Goldstein, an antitrust and litigation partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in San Francisco, recently left to join several of his former Heller Ehrman colleagues at Farmer Brownstein Jaeger & Goldstein, a Bay Area-based boutique that now has his name on its shingle.
April 06, 2018 at 03:48 PM
4 minute read
David Goldstein.
Litigation and antitrust partner David Goldstein has left Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to rejoin several of his former Heller Ehrman colleagues at Farmer Brownstein Jaeger & Goldstein, a San Francisco-based boutique that has added his name to its shingle.
Goldstein and his co-worker David Brownstein joined Orrick in 2008 when Heller Ehrman's partners voted to dissolve the 118-year-old firm. Another of their partners, Charles “Chuck” Jaeger, was recruited to Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Three years after Heller Ehrman collapsed, Brownstein and Jaeger came together and joined William “Buck” Farmer to form a boutique law firm that specializes in antitrust and other complex business litigation. Since then, the group at the firm formerly known as Farmer Brownstein Jaeger has been trying to convince Goldstein to join.
“Having been in the large firm environment for almost 30 years, the pull of the invitation to work with two guys I had grown up with as a young lawyer until Heller folded in 2008 was too strong to resist. And Buck is wonderful. I had a great experience working with him in a price-fixing case, and I learned a lot from him,” said Goldstein. “So, it was more the pull of working here than just wanting to leave the Big Law firm environment. I was in large firms for almost 30 years, and the attraction of trying something different like this was very strong.”
Goldstein started working at the firm on Feb. 12. After working at big firms for most of his career, Goldstein said it has been a big transition for him, but he was excited to reunite with his former colleagues.
Goldstein has represented both defendants and plaintiffs in complex litigation in federal and state courts, as well as in arbitrations. For the past 20 years, much of his practice has focused on antitrust and competition matters involving cartels, dominant firms and monopoly cases.
“Most of my practice the past 15 years has been antitrust work, but commercial litigation has always been part of my work, and I greatly enjoy it,” said Goldstein. He expects to do more commercial litigation at the boutique.
With Goldstein joining the team, the firm currently has five partners, as well as an office manager, a legal assistant, and other contract lawyers as needed.
“We not only respect David a great deal as a lawyer because we practiced with him—he is a great friend of ours—but the other factor is that we are buried right now with work, and we need help,” Jaeger said.
Unlike big firms, Goldstein said his boutique does not offer the same administrative support. However, he said that is also an advantage since the boutique has less overhead costs and charges clients lower billing rates.
“What we are trying to do as a smaller firm—and I think this is probably true for lots of firms like ours—is that when we get hired, the partners do the work,” said Goldstein. “We don't usually work in teams of five, six or seven people, so we have very close relationships with clients. They really get our attention.”
The group said as of now they are comfortable with their current size. As more big firms are moving into California, increasing the competition in the market, their strategy is collaborating with the big firms instead of competing head-to-head with them.
“If the case has 50 or 100 million pieces of paper, and requires a squad of lawyers, we are not in competition with them,” Brownstein said. But, he added, there are plenty of cases that don't call for “a lot of associates, that can be handled very efficiently at [a] firm our size at sort of the partner level.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readAnapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute readPierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250