2 Proposals Open Door to Free Driverless Testing Programs
If the pilot programs are approved, the utility commission will begin crafting "a broader framework" allowing companies to accept paying passenger.
April 06, 2018 at 07:02 PM
4 minute read
A Waymo driverless car. Courtesy.
Autonomous vehicle companies could start offering free test rides to the public later this year under one of two pilot programs proposed Friday by the California Public Utilities Commission.
The other test program would authorize free autonomous vehicle rides in cars with a trained driver behind the wheel. Both pilot programs must be approved by the full commission.
“These proposals allow the introduction of AVs into passenger service to the public on a pilot basis, while providing for the safety and consumer protection of the passengers, consistent with the commission's regulation of private passenger-carrying transportation entities,” PUC Commissioner Liane Randolph wrote in the 44-page document.
If the pilot programs are approved, the PUC will begin crafting “a broader framework” allowing companies to accept paying passengers in their autonomous vehicles, according to an agency statement.
As the proposals were released Friday afternoon, the Department of Motor Vehicles confirmed that it has received an application to test autonomous cars without a driver on state roads. The application period opened on Monday after regulations, under review for months, were enacted.
DMV spokeswoman Jessica Gonzalez said the DMV won't release the name of the company seeking the testing permit until the agency determines the paperwork is complete. That could happen as soon as April 12, she said.
Fifty-two companies held permits to test “drivered” autonomous vehicles as of April 1, according to the DMV. No company is permitted in California to transport passengers, although some have taken reporters and government officials for test rides. Waymo has offered free test rides to passengers in Arizona since last year.
At the time Randolph wrote her order, only two companies, Lyft Inc. and Uber Advanced Technologies Group—Uber's autonomous testing arm—had obtained both an autonomous vehicle testing permit from the DMV and a transportation charter permit while listing driverless cars as part of their fleets.
Uber has since announced it would not renew its DMV testing permit, which expired on March 31. The company suspended testing nationwide after one of its cars operating in autonomous mode struck and killed a pedestrian in Tempe, Arizona, on March 18.
A Lyft spokeswoman did not respond to a message seeking comment.
Both pilot programs would require companies to comply with certain restrictions.
All cars in the program would have to be road-tested for at least 90 days before accepting passengers. Airports would be off-limits. Permit holders would have to report all communications between passengers and the vehicles' remote operators and to submit publicly available data to the PUC every month. Every car would also have to comply with the DMV's safety and operations rules.
The commission is scheduled to vote on the program proposal on May 10.
The proposals are posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Plaintiffs Seek to Avoid Jurisdiction Fight in IVF Case, Challenge CooperSurgical in Connecticut
4 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
Trending Stories
- 1Womans Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
- 2Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 3Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 4Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 5Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250