While Zuck Goes Hat-in-Hand to Congress, Facebook's Lawyers Hit Back at Data Suits
In the runup to Mark Zuckerberg's Congressional testimony, Facebook's lawyers at Gibson Dunn claimed that the company "broke no laws and violated no legal duties" in a filing before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
April 09, 2018 at 05:03 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
As Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has prepared to apologize this week on Capitol Hill over security issues, the social media giant's lawyers struck a less conciliatory tone in court, where about 20 consumer class actions are pending over the Cambridge Analytica debacle.
In prepared testimony released ahead of Wednesday's hearing before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce, Zuckerberg apologized for Cambridge Analytica and other lapses that led to fake news, foreign interference in elections and hate speech on Facebook. “We didn't take a broad enough view of our responsibility, and that was a big mistake,” Zuckerberg said. “It was my mistake, and I'm sorry.” Zuckerberg also faces a joint hearing of the U.S. Senate Commerce and Judiciary committees on Tuesday.
But in court papers filed on Friday before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, which plaintiffs lawyers have asked to coordinate the consumer cases over Cambridge Analytica, Facebook lead counsel Orin Snyder of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in New York took a much more forceful stance in defending his client.
“Facebook is strongly committed to protecting users' information, and it has already taken and continues to take substantial actions to address the conduct that gave rise to these cases,” he wrote. “But the lawsuits that have been filed against Facebook are misguided: Facebook broke no laws and violated no legal duties. And although Cambridge Analytica and other related actors used data for purposes that Facebook and its users never authorized, there was no data breach—no unauthorized access to Facebook's systems and no hacking of user data.”
Orin Snyder.He went on to say that third parties, such as Aleksandr Kogan, the developer of the app that collected data through a personality test, violated Facebook's terms of service in sharing the information with Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm with ties to Trump's presidential campaign in 2016. He also claimed Kogan and his company assured Facebook the information had been deleted.
The suits primarily name Facebook and Cambridge Analytica, but Kogan or his company, Global Science Research, were defendants in at least five cases. Zuckerberg, Cambridge Analytica investor Robert Mercer and former Trump campaign aide Steve Bannon also were defendants in a handful of cases.
Snyder and Facebook did not respond to requests for comment. Zuckerberg has previously given assurances of change, stating that Facebook would begin verifying identities of political advertisers and is simplifying its privacy and security settings.
Plaintiffs attorney Michael Sobol of San Francisco's Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Hank Bates of Carney, Bates & Pulliam in Little Rock, Arkansas, have moved to coordinate all the consumer cases to U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in the Northern District of California. Those cases, which are among numerous lawsuits and legal probes in the United States and the United Kingdom over the scandal, allege Facebook violated consumer fraud and privacy laws in allowing Cambridge Analytica to use data from 87 million users. They are pending in five states, including California, Texas and New Jersey.
Facebook supports the move but requested U.S. District Judge Edward Davila, to whom the MDL panel last week assigned 61 lawsuits against Apple Inc. brought over alleged defects in iPhone batteries. Facebook noted that Davila is overseeing two related shareholder cases and that many relevant witnesses, and its headquarters, would be in Silicon Valley.
But in supporting an MDL, Snyder noted that each case suffered “from similar deficiencies,” primarily involving certification of a nationwide class and failure to assert that anyone was injured from the alleged breach.
“And all of the putative classes suffer from the same weaknesses that, in Facebook's view, will make class certification impossible, including the common struggle to identify any cognizable theory of injury or damages, and the myriad individualized issues, including issues of consent, that will predominate over any classwide concerns,” he wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readMeta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
Trending Stories
- 1Troutman Pepper, Claiming Ex-Associate's Firing Was Performance Related, Seeks Summary Judgment in Discrimination Suit
- 2Law Firm Fails to Get Punitive Damages From Ex-Client
- 3Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 4Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 5Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250