ABA Warns Golden Gate Law School About Low Bar-Pass Rates, High Attrition
In a letter to GGU's president and law school dean this week, the ABA said that the school was "significantly out of compliance" certain performance thresholds needed to maintain accreditation.
April 12, 2018 at 05:22 PM
3 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — An official with the American Bar Association informed Golden Gate University School of Law this week that it was “significantly out of compliance” with certain performance thresholds needed to maintain accreditation.
In an April 10 letter addressed to GGU's president and law school dean, Barry Currier, the ABA's managing director of accreditation and legal education wrote that the law school was “not in compliance with” an ABA admissions standard requiring schools to deny entry to students who don't appear capable of completing their programs or passing the bar. According to the most recent available report GGU made to the ABA, the school lost 30.5 percent of its first-year students to “non-transfer attrition.” Just 51 percent of first-time test-takers from GGU passed the California bar exam in July 2017.
Dean Anthony Niedwiecki, Golden Gate University School of LawIn a prepared statement addressing the ABA's letter, GGU Law School Dean Anthony Niedwiecki, who joined the school last August from The John Marshall Law School in Chicago, said that the ABA's findings were based on the school's first-time bar pass rates and attrition rates from 2015 and 2016, and that they do “not impact GGU Law's accreditation.”
“[The letter] simply requires that we continue providing details on our admissions and bar passage goals and the steps we are taking to meet these goals,” Niedwiecki said.
The dean pointed out that the school's first-time pass rate this year was 20 points higher than it was in July 2016. Niedwiecki said the school had lowered its transfer rate from 13 percent to 9 percent since his arrival, and improved its job placement rate by 14 percent. The school, he said, has also launched “one of the most comprehensive bar preparation and academic development programs in the country” in partnership with bar review company Themis.
The ABA has asked Golden Gate to submit a letter addressing the applicable standards by Jan. 15, 2019, and, possibly appear before its Accreditation Committee at its May 2019 meeting.
“If the information provided in the writer report demonstrates compliance with the Standards listed above, then the Committee may find the Law School to be in compliance with the Standards and cancel the hearing,” the ABA's Currier wrote. The ABA's letter was first reported by ABA Journal.
A copy of the ABA's letter and Niedwiecki's response are available below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readOpenAI, NYTimes Counsel Quarrel Over Erased OpenAI Training Data
Meta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250