How to Ask About Compensation in a Job Interview Without Sounding Greedy
For some, “comp” is deliberately discussed at the very beginning to qualify a candidate's viability upfront. For others, it's a topic that remains unaddressed until it's time to talk turkey. But waiting to discuss money until the interview process is at completion is not a wise move.
April 13, 2018 at 11:55 AM
4 minute read
Q: I'm near the end of a job interview process and still don't know the compensation range for the position. When and how should I ask without sounding greedy?
A: No two search processes are alike. And when it comes to disclosing … or discussing a position's compensation range, the timing of this talk-thread can be quite different in each process. For some, “comp” is deliberately discussed at the very beginning to qualify a candidate's viability upfront. For others, it's a topic that remains unaddressed until it's time to talk turkey. But waiting to discuss money until the interview process is at completion is not a wise move.
This might be easier said than done … as many candidates are uncomfortable raising the topic of compensation in the interview process. Why? Because they don't want to be perceived as solely caring about money, being greedy or having their priorities out of whack. So, they stay silent out of fear and wait for the employer to start the money dialogue. But inquiring about compensation does not have to be such an unsavory task. It can be empowering and demonstrate confidence depending on how … and when you ask. And as a candidate, it's important to be cognizant of compensation as you engage in an interview process—and gather this information before either party has invested too much time. As you assess the interview dynamics, use your best judgment regarding the appropriate time to raise the issue if an employer does not raise it.
In your situation, you are in the “final stages” of your interview process. And you and the employer have invested time and effort to get to this point. But despite your proximity to the finish line, you are still unaware of the compensation range for the position. And depending on the numbers, you could be pulled back to the Starting Line. So at this late stage, this lack of material information is not ideal—because if there is compensation misalignment, the time by both parties will not have been well spent. So my recommendation at this juncture is to address the compensation topic in your next conversation with HR or the hiring manager.
So what's the most effective way to raise the subject without the risk you'll be perceived negatively? Below are a few recommendations:
Message #1:
Employer: “So, do you have any questions at this point?”
Candidate Response #1: “Yes—It's been such a great process and I've been so engaged in getting to know everyone that I realized we never discussed the compensation range for the position. If you have any information available, that would be terrific.”
Candidate Response #2: “The role sounds very appealing and I'm very interested in the opportunity. Do you have a sense as to the compensation range for the position?”
Message #2
“Hi Robert, I really enjoyed my meetings on Monday with the executives and wanted to reach out to see if you could provide me with the compensation range for the position. We haven't had the opportunity to discuss it in the process so it would be great to know what the target range is for the role.
Message #3
“Thank you for taking so much time to meet with me Susan. The opportunity seems like it would be a great fit for both of us. Would you happen to know the compensation range for the position? I've been so focused on learning about the position and getting to know everyone that I haven't had that conversation with anyone in the organization. Any information you might be able to provide would be terrific.”
Raising the topic of compensation is rarely easy for a candidate, but it is important information to have when interviewing for a job that interests you. It's best to gather this information sooner rather than later, but if you find yourself near the end of an interview process without the numbers, I recommend you kick the comp inquiry into high gear. And inquire strategically in order to maximize your chances of a positive … and successful outcome.
Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 2The Definition of Special Employment
- 3People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 4Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
- 5Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250