Lawmakers Push Resolution of Dispute Over Judicial Commission Records
The judicial commission in 2016 sued to block the first-ever audit, arguing that conflicting laws could make records improperly subject to public disclosure.
April 16, 2018 at 08:26 PM
3 minute read
Sacramento State Capitol building on Capitol Way. Credit: Jason Doiy/ Recorder
State lawmakers on Monday pressed the state auditor and the Commission on Judicial Performance to settle their legal fight over access to complaints against judges, saying the dispute is thwarting the Legislature's oversight and budgeting duties.
Lawmakers in 2016 authorized the first-ever audit of the commission, which investigates claims of judicial misconduct. The review was supposed to cover dozens of items, from how the agency decides to investigate complaints to how its disciplinary process compares to those in other states.
The commission in October 2016 sued to block the audit, arguing that conflicting laws could make records compiled by the auditor improperly subject to public disclosure. The auditor disagrees and has vowed to keep any documents confidential.
A San Francisco Superior Court judge in December sided with the commission. The California Supreme Court last week refused to hear a direct appeal in the case, which now is pending at the First District Court of Appeal. A final disposition could take several years.
“If we have to wait now for a couple of years, I think that's going to be frustrating for everybody,” Assemblyman Mark Stone, D-Scotts Valley, said at a subcommittee hearing reviewing the commission's budget. “If this winds up putting some limits on our ability to perform our oversight ability—if the courts decide that, the courts decide that. But it will not go very well with our constituencies who are asking us to perform this” oversight.
The commission has been assailed in recent years by family law litigants and their advocates, who complain that the agency does not adequately discipline judges. Those complaints, as well as those of judges who argue just the opposite—that the agency is overly hostile to judges—helped spur the audit.
Gregory Dresser, the commission's director and chief counsel, told the subcommittee that after years of budget cuts and freezes the size of the agency's staff is 10 percent smaller than it was 20 years ago. The commission is not trying to hide anything, he said, but it “needs certainty that all the records in the hands of the auditor remain confidential.”
Stone said the auditor's review of the commission's workload and staffing could give lawmakers “a better understanding of the challenges that you face.”
“My plea is, let's find a way to resolve this,” Stone said. “As a policy maker I don't know what to do with all of this yet, and I'm frustrated at having to wait. … Let's find a way to get there sooner rather than later. That's what I ask.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250