Gavelytics Launches New Tool Crunching Numbers on SF Superior Court Judges
The platform is targeted at helping lawyers decide whether to "paper" a judge, as well as how to steer the litigation once it is off and running.
April 19, 2018 at 06:27 PM
3 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — California judicial analytics startup Gavelytics has expanded its platform to include data for the San Francisco County Superior Court.
The move comes after the company, which previously offered data only for state courts in Los Angeles and Riverside counties, announced a $3.2 million fund raise in March.
The platform is targeted in part at helping lawyers decide whether to issue a peremptory challenge at the outset of their case, also known as “papering” a judge, as well as how to steer the litigation once it is off and running.
Gavelytics founder and CEO Rick Merrill announced the expansion in a press release Tuesday, saying it would be “a powerful tool” for attorneys litigating in San Francisco.
The company's analytics show that, of the two complex litigation judges in San Francisco, “one is dramatically more defense-friendly at bench trial,” the release said. “However, the other judge is more likely to grant summary judgment.”
Gavelytics did not identify either judge in the release. The two complex litigation judges at San Francisco Superior Court are Judges Mary Wiss and Curtis Karnow.
The company said it has also identified which San Francisco judges are most likely to grant different types of motions, including discovery motions, and which judges receive the most peremptory challenges by filing party and case type.
Gavelytics launched in 2017 with a focus on providing data about California state courts. Merrill is a former Greenberg Traurig lawyer and told Legaltech News last year he founded the company after growing frustrated with anecdotal information being shared on email threads.
➤➤ Want to read more about how technology is changing the legal profession? Sign up for What's Next, a weekly email briefing on the future of law.
The development is another sign of the legal analytics space growing increasingly crowded, although not every company has the same focus. Lex Machina, for example, has chiefly offered data on federal courts, although it recently launched a module for the Delaware Court of Chancery. Judicata, another California-focused legal tech company, is primarily geared toward enabling attorneys to do more intelligent legal research.
Gavelytics has raised a total of $5.7 million since 2016, including a funding round that netted the company $3.2 million at the beginning of March.
Merrill has said the funding will enable the company to “accelerate” its development road map for other states. Later in the year, Gavelytics also plans to add arbitration rulings to its data set and to release a searchable trial court database for judges in Los Angeles County.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
Plaintiffs Seek to Avoid Jurisdiction Fight in IVF Case, Challenge CooperSurgical in Connecticut
4 minute readPorsche's Venture Capital Arm Adds General Counsel From Clifford Chance
Trending Stories
- 1Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 2Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 3Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
- 4Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
- 5Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250