L.A. Boutique Stris & Maher Claims 'Total Victory' in Settlement About Alleged Trump Affair
Peter Stris, who has argued seven U.S. Supreme Court cases, called ex-Playboy model Karen McDougal's settlement "probably the most rewarding result I ever got in my career."
April 19, 2018 at 01:36 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Despite outside pressure to continue his lawsuit, Peter Stris of Stris & Maher on Wednesday night declared “total victory” in a settlement on behalf of former Playboy model Karen McDougal who allegedly had an affair with President Donald Trump.
Stris negotiated the settlement with American Media Inc., owner of the National Enquirer, which had paid McDougal $150,000 for the rights to her story about Trump shortly before the presidential election. AMI, in the contract, also had committed to feature her future fitness articles and photos in its magazine. A story about her relationship with Trump was never published.
“If this contract had been voided, she would have had to pay back the $150,000,” Stris told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow. “Here she got out of every obligation under the contract. She doesn't have to do articles. She doesn't have to take pictures. They gave her life rights back immediately—minus $75,000 if she happens to sell it, which she doesn't want to. And that's the maximum they get. They get 10 percent up to $75,000. That's basically the best we could have gotten had we litigated this to the end.”
McDougal was represented by entertainment lawyer Keith Davidson in the contract negotiations with AMI in August 2016. It was subsequently learned that Davidson had been in contact with Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, at the time.
AMI said in a statement Wednesday: “AMI is pleased that we reached an amicable resolution with Ms. McDougal today that provides both sides what they wanted as a result.”
Maddow asked Stris, whose boutique firm handles complex and U.S. Supreme Court litigation, if he had experienced political pressure from anyone to settle the case. “Just the opposite,” he said.
“What's made this so difficult is people want to see a fight; people want to see this used to essentially expose the things that are going on,” said Stris, referring indirectly to the recent legal actions surrounding Cohen. “When you're a lawyer and you represent a client—the reason people like Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson are creating all this mischief is because they're not faithfully representing people.”
When McDougal came to him, Stris recalled, she said she wanted out of the contract—no money, just the ability to tell her side of the story without fear of retribution. She was “unbelievably frightened,” Stris said, because AMI allegedly threatened to sue her for millions of dollars and to destroy her reputation if she spoke publicly. McDougal was able to do an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper, he said, because Stris had filed his lawsuit against AMI.
Stris said he was fully prepared to take depositions to get documents and recordings. “Nothing would have made me personally happier, but that's not what Karen wanted. What Karen wanted was not to be beholden to this company,” he said.
McDougal turned to Stris for help on the recommendation of Theodore Boutrous of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Boutrous had made an offer on Twitter to provide pro bono legal assistance to anyone attacked by Trump for exercising his or her free speech rights. Stris contacted Boutrous and offered to join him. Stris told Maddow that his firm had donated “hundreds of thousands of dollars and time” to her case.
Just earlier in the day, Stris and a partner, Daniel Geyser, were at the U.S. Supreme Court for argument in Lagos v. United States. Geyser argued for Sergio Fernando Lagos in a dispute over federal victim restitution.
Stris, who has argued seven Supreme Court cases, called the McDougal settlement “probably the most rewarding result I ever got in my career.” McDougal, he said, was the victim of a “pattern of powerful men” trying to silence women.
“If people can't appreciate the fact that someone caught up in that has the right to have their voice and to have someone represent them to get out of it, then I really have no tolerance for them,” he said. “That's how the system should work.”
Read more:
How Stris & Maher Connected With Ex-Playboy Model Who Claims Trump Affair
Ex-'Apprentice' Contestant's Defamation Claim Against Trump May Proceed
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250