Exclusion Did Not Bar Insurance Coverage For Chatsworth Train Collision, California Appellate Court Affirms
A California appellate court found that an “intended or expected” insurance policy exclusion didn't bar coverage for damages in a fatal 2008 head-on collision between a Metrolink commuter train and a Union Pacific freight train in Los Angeles.
April 23, 2018 at 11:49 AM
6 minute read
This story is reprinted with permission from FC&S Legal, the industry's only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
A California appellate court has ruled that an “intended or expected” insurance policy exclusion did not bar insurance coverage for damages resulting from the fatal head-on collision between a Metrolink commuter train and a Union Pacific freight train that occurred in the Chatsworth district of Los Angeles, California, on September 12, 2008.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250