Stanford Class of 1998 Has Magic Formula for Producing Top Female Law Deans
The school's small size and faculty mentorship helped three women from the same class become leaders of top law schools.
April 26, 2018 at 02:47 PM
5 minute read
Pictured, from left, are Kimberly Yuracko, Kerry Abrams and Gillian Lester.
Come September, Stanford Law School's class of 1998 will have produced not one, not two, but three deans of top law schools—and all three are women.
Kimberly Yuracko, the incoming dean at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, and Kerry Abrams, who will assume the deanship at Duke Law School in July, both received their Juris Doctors from Stanford in 1998. Columbia Law School Dean Gillian Lester was on the Palo Alto campus from 1992 to 1993 working toward her Doctor of the Science of Law (JSD), but didn't defend her dissertation until 1998. (She taught at the University of California Los Angeles School of Law in between.)
“We're very proud that three people who did a lot of their training here are now going to be trying to sustain and improve the legal education at three great institutions,” said Stanford professor Mark Kelman, who all three deans cited as a mentor who helped them launch their academic careers. “Columbia, Duke and Northwestern are great law schools, and they will shepherd them forward.”
The trio of deans said in interviews this week that they didn't know each other as students, but they have found professional inspiration and support from one another since their time on campus.
“Gillian gave me tremendous help and mentorship when I started out in law teaching, and I tried to be helpful to Kerry when she was on the entry-level market a few years after me,” Yuracko said. “It is a really nice group and a very nice connection to Stanford.”
Abrams said that Yuracko's support helped her navigate the transition from litigator to legal academic. Lester too made an impact, though from afar.
“Gillian's book with Kelman ["Jumping the Queue: An Inquiry into the Legal Treatment of Students With Learning Disabilities"] came out when I was a law student,” Abrams said. “It was inspirational to me to see someone publishing with one of my favorite professors. It was one of the things that made me think, 'Maybe I can do this.'”
Lester said that Kelman put Yuracko on her radar early on.
“My first awareness that she had come on the scene as a new scholar happened because we shared a mentor at Stanford,” she said. “It was through Mark Kelman that I started to learn about and read her work. The Stanford connection definitely forged a link between Kim and me early in our careers.”
➤➤ Stay on top of developments and trends in legal education with Ahead of the Curve by Karen Sloan, a new weekly briefing from Law.com. Sign up here and get next week's email update straight to your inbox.
While Lester co-authored a book with Kelman, the professor's ties to Yuracko extend even farther back. He tutored Yuracko at the University of Oxford when she was a junior there. Abrams took his property course.
“He was the person who convinced me to stick with law school when I had doubts,” Abrams said. “And he was one of the people I went to years later when I was thinking about moving back to academia, to ask his advice.”
But Kelman is quick to say that the trio's success is not because of his mentorship. Rather, he recognized their potential early on.
“What made them so much fun to work with as a teacher is precisely what other people are noticing now and making them deans,” Kelman said. “I didn't cause it. I noticed it. They were really intellectually energetic, exciting, thoughtful people.”
Lester and Abrams said that Stanford's relatively small size may be a factor in their success in the legal academy because it offered ample opportunity for faculty mentorship. They both stayed in touch with Stanford professors after graduation and got advice on entering the academy.
Lester knew she wanted to teach before enrolling at Stanford, and took a seminar co-taught by then-Dean Paul Brest and former professor Peggy Radin that was designed to help students become law professors.
“We would usually meet at Peggy's home, which was very welcoming,” Lester said. “And we would put together papers that would later become possible job talk papers. We had to teach classes—we had to lead the seminar on different topics. We got exposure to what it is to run a class and what kinds of things we needed to start thinking about to have the necessary presentation skills for an academic context.”
Courses deigned for prospective law teachers are common now, but were still new at the time, she said. Lester added that the Stanford Law faculty also took students seriously and treated them much like colleagues
Kelman believes that the gender climate at Stanford at the time may also have played a role in how the then-students viewed their career prospects. Kathleen Sullivan, now a name partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, would become dean of the school the year after the trio graduated.
“It's not surprising that women just before the turn of the millennium coming out of Stanford had high levels of confidence and high expectations,” he said. “Beginning in the mid-80s, I think this was a school where women were not just present but were held in high esteem and had positions of social power. I think they were coming out of an environment in which both expectations for and respect for women academics was in the air. I think it was in the air here earlier than it was in some other places. I think that probably helped.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readIs Big Law's Nonequity Tier a 'Parking Lot' or a 'Ladder'?
'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
7 minute readDuane Morris Uses Nonequity Partnership as 'Income Shifting' Device, Class Action Contends
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Settlements of 2024
- 2Black, Hispanic Law Student Enrollment Falls at Top 14 Following End of Affirmative Action, but Mostly Improved at California's Top Schools
- 3Justices Wade Into South Carolina's Medicaid Fight With Planned Parenthood
- 4Fisher & Phillips Elects 25 New Partners In 15 Cities
- 5New York State Bar Outlines 2025 Legislative Priorities, Aiming for Fairness, Equity
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250