Top Lawyers at Cisco, NetApp and HPE Say Legal Ops Has Been a Game Changer
At the final panel at the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium's 2018 institute, in-house leaders from the Silicon Valley tech companies shared thoughts about the rise of legal ops.
April 26, 2018 at 12:44 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Jeff Franke of Yahoo, Matt Fawcett of NetApp, Mark Chandler of Cisco, and John Schultz of HPE. Photo credit: Caroline Spiezio/ALM
The general counsel role is one that's evolved immensely in the past few years, and that's in no small part due to the growth of legal operations, according to three top in-house lawyers at major tech companies.
At the final panel discussion at the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium's 2018 institute, Yahoo's legal ops leader Jeff Franke got NetApp Inc. GC Matt Fawcett, Cisco Systems Inc. GC Mark Chandler and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. CLO John Schultz to open up about the changes they've seen due to the rise of legal ops.
Schultz said he started an ops function at HPE because he wanted greater process efficiency–but that the function's changed the department in many other ways too.
“The discipline that [legal operations] brings around dashboarding and analytics really does drive a different level of excellence into the business,” he said. “We're not all that comfortable with numbers and scorecards and so forth and the ops group has done a tremendous job at creating that rigor that I think has improved the excellence of what we do in a demonstrable way.”
The ability to improve a department's performance is important, according to Schultz, but legal ops' role in measuring that success in a visible way has also been crucial in expanding the influence of in-house legal throughout HPE.
“When you can [provide metrics] on a consistent basis, it increases so greatly the credibility that you have inside the company,” he said. “It then allows you to have an expanded role.”
Fawcett echoed these statements. At NetApp, he and Connie Brenton, the company's senior director of legal operations, have played a role in beta testing new technologies for other departments, created workflows for processes outside of legal and served on the company's technology investment board.
Chandler said legal operations has helped companies tap into and better utilize the legal department, as it's one of few groups that works with the entire organization.
“They see every transaction the company does, and that's why the legal operations role is so important,” he said. Chandler added that operations' ability to turn the data from these transactions into meaningful dashboards has been useful at Cisco.
The panelists also noted legal operations' role in pushing their departments to be more tech-oriented, while increasing efficiency and lowering cost. Fawcett said these changes were possible by reassessing risk levels and not being afraid to take a chance.
In his experience, many legal departments may be overcautious, leading to expensive and inefficient strategies. GCs that want to see real improvement in their department should be more open to taking a risk and try new technologies and processes, he explained.
“One of my jobs is being the person who says, 'We can take that risk,'” Fawcett said. “Let's take that risk. You're not going to break NetApp with one bad transaction.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250