Here's Where Weedmaps Is Spending Its Lobbying Cash
The company's political activity coincides with a busy political season as lawmakers and regulators try to shape permanent rules for the medical and recreational cannabis industries.
May 01, 2018 at 08:10 PM
4 minute read
Weedmaps, the online marijuana directory under scrutiny from California regulators, has emerged as a major industry player in state politics based on recent campaign and lobbying records.
Over the first three months of the year, the Orange County-based company spent $90,000 lobbying the Legislature, the governor's office and five agencies responsible for overseeing California's nascent marijuana market, according to filings with the Secretary of State's office.
Weedmaps spent another $67,100 on political contributions to the California Democratic Party and 10 state lawmakers between February and April 25, the records show. The donations included $25,000 to state Democrats shortly before their convention in San Diego as well as $10,000 each to the ballot campaign accounts of Assembly Budget Committee chairman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, and Assemblyman Adam Gray, D-Merced, who chairs the Governmental Organizational Committee. Both committees vet bills and policies affecting Weedmaps and other marijuana companies.
Get the latest cannabis lawyering, compliance and commentary straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
The company's political activity coincides with a busy political season as lawmakers and regulators try to shape permanent rules for the medical and recreational cannabis industries. The advocacy also follows a February warning from the Bureau of Cannabis Control—in the form of a cease-and-desist letter—to stop running ads from operators not licensed by the state to do business in California.
Weedmaps executives, including president and general counsel Chris Beals, fired back with their own letter, saying that, while they were willing to work with regulators, the state has no authority to sanction them. A Bureau of Cannabis Control spokesman said Tuesday that there were no new developments to report in the dispute with the company. A Weedmaps spokesman did not return a message seeking comment.
In the Legislature, Weedmaps' recent focus has primarily been on bills about marijuana delivery and advertising.
One bill, by Weedmaps critic Assemblyman Jim Cooper, D-Elk Grove, would have levied $10,000 civil penalties on operators who use fake license numbers in advertising after a 48-hour warning to stop. AB 2866 was approved on a bipartisan vote in the Business and Professions Committee before dying in late April without a hearing in the Public Safety Committee. Weedmaps was not registered as a formal opponent of the bill, although the company's filings noted that it was lobbying on the bill.
Here are some other take-aways from the recent campaign and lobbying filings:
➤➤ The California Cannabis Industry Association's political action committee, Cannabis Action, spent more than $27,000 in the first quarter, with $10,000 going to four lawmakers. The industry group reported no lobbying payments during the first three months of the year.
➤➤ Marijuana delivery has shaped up as a hot topic for the industry. Eaze Solutions Inc., the delivery app, spent just over $74,000 on lobbying in the first quarter. The California Cannabis Delivery Association spent $18,000 and delivery service We Drop Co. paid $12,000 to lobby shops over the same three months. All eyes are on SB 1302, which would bar cities and counties from enacting ordinances that prohibit licensed companies from delivering marijuana to local residents. The bill goes to a policy committee hearing Wednesday.
➤➤ The California Native American Cannabis Association spent $39,500 on lobbying early this year. The group is working on legislation to allow tribes to grow and sell legal marijuana without affecting their sovereign rights.
California Strategies & Advocacy and The Quintana Cruz Company remain two of the largest contract lobby shops for marijuana businesses and trade groups.
Read more:
Higher Law: What to Ask Would-Be Clients? | California Pot Practices Flourish
Higher Law: Your 4/20 Update on Cannabis as a Practice
Venable's Tracking Cannabis for New Digital Money Lobbying Client
Weedmaps Turns to 'Section 230' Defense Against Regulators
The Challenges of Cannabis Lawyering in Nevada
Marijuana Advertising, Licensing Draw Warning Letters From Regulators
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readMeta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250