Here's Where Weedmaps Is Spending Its Lobbying Cash
The company's political activity coincides with a busy political season as lawmakers and regulators try to shape permanent rules for the medical and recreational cannabis industries.
May 01, 2018 at 08:10 PM
4 minute read
Sacramento State Capitol building on Capitol Way. Credit: Jason Doiy / The Recorder
Weedmaps, the online marijuana directory under scrutiny from California regulators, has emerged as a major industry player in state politics based on recent campaign and lobbying records.
Over the first three months of the year, the Orange County-based company spent $90,000 lobbying the Legislature, the governor's office and five agencies responsible for overseeing California's nascent marijuana market, according to filings with the Secretary of State's office.
Weedmaps spent another $67,100 on political contributions to the California Democratic Party and 10 state lawmakers between February and April 25, the records show. The donations included $25,000 to state Democrats shortly before their convention in San Diego as well as $10,000 each to the ballot campaign accounts of Assembly Budget Committee chairman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, and Assemblyman Adam Gray, D-Merced, who chairs the Governmental Organizational Committee. Both committees vet bills and policies affecting Weedmaps and other marijuana companies.
Get the latest cannabis lawyering, compliance and commentary straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
The company's political activity coincides with a busy political season as lawmakers and regulators try to shape permanent rules for the medical and recreational cannabis industries. The advocacy also follows a February warning from the Bureau of Cannabis Control—in the form of a cease-and-desist letter—to stop running ads from operators not licensed by the state to do business in California.
Weedmaps executives, including president and general counsel Chris Beals, fired back with their own letter, saying that, while they were willing to work with regulators, the state has no authority to sanction them. A Bureau of Cannabis Control spokesman said Tuesday that there were no new developments to report in the dispute with the company. A Weedmaps spokesman did not return a message seeking comment.
In the Legislature, Weedmaps' recent focus has primarily been on bills about marijuana delivery and advertising.
One bill, by Weedmaps critic Assemblyman Jim Cooper, D-Elk Grove, would have levied $10,000 civil penalties on operators who use fake license numbers in advertising after a 48-hour warning to stop. AB 2866 was approved on a bipartisan vote in the Business and Professions Committee before dying in late April without a hearing in the Public Safety Committee. Weedmaps was not registered as a formal opponent of the bill, although the company's filings noted that it was lobbying on the bill.
Here are some other take-aways from the recent campaign and lobbying filings:
➤➤ The California Cannabis Industry Association's political action committee, Cannabis Action, spent more than $27,000 in the first quarter, with $10,000 going to four lawmakers. The industry group reported no lobbying payments during the first three months of the year.
➤➤ Marijuana delivery has shaped up as a hot topic for the industry. Eaze Solutions Inc., the delivery app, spent just over $74,000 on lobbying in the first quarter. The California Cannabis Delivery Association spent $18,000 and delivery service We Drop Co. paid $12,000 to lobby shops over the same three months. All eyes are on SB 1302, which would bar cities and counties from enacting ordinances that prohibit licensed companies from delivering marijuana to local residents. The bill goes to a policy committee hearing Wednesday.
➤➤ The California Native American Cannabis Association spent $39,500 on lobbying early this year. The group is working on legislation to allow tribes to grow and sell legal marijuana without affecting their sovereign rights.
California Strategies & Advocacy and The Quintana Cruz Company remain two of the largest contract lobby shops for marijuana businesses and trade groups.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
6 minute readMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250