Judge Tosses Facebook's Suit Against IRS Challenging Denial of Internal Appeal
The company sued the IRS last fall as part of an ongoing dispute over the value of assets Facebook Inc. transferred in 2010 to its Irish holding company.
May 15, 2018 at 07:48 PM
3 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — A magistrate judge in San Francisco has tossed out a lawsuit by Facebook Inc. against the IRS, ruling the social media giant does not have a right to challenge its massive tax bill through an internal IRS appeals process.
The company sued the IRS last fall as part of an ongoing dispute with the tax authority over the value of assets Facebook transferred in 2010 to its Irish holding company. The IRS said Facebook undervalued those assets by some $7 billion, which Facebook contests.
In an order Monday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler of the Northern District of California dismissed Facebook's case with prejudice, ruling the company could not allege its rights were impinged by being denied access to the IRS Office of Appeals as part of that dispute.
“The sole injury that Facebook alleges is that 'it was denied access to a statutorily mandated appeals process,' i.e., the right to take its tax case to IRS Appeals,” Beeler wrote. “But Facebook fails to establish that it has a legally protected right to take its tax case to IRS Appeals.”
“Because Facebook has no legally enforceable right to take its tax case to IRS Appeals, the IRS has not invaded a legally protected interest by refusing to refer Facebook's case to IRS Appeals, and Facebook consequently lacks standing,” the judge added.
Scott Frewing, a partner at Baker McKenzie representing Facebook in the case, declined to comment.
Facebook claimed that IRS counsel stymied the company's request to pursue an internal IRS appeal by citing a seldom-used rule that allows IRS exam teams to block an appeal if they determine such an appeal is not in the interest of “sound tax administration.” The company brought the claim under the Administrative Procedure Act.
But Beeler ruled the company also could not challenge the rule itself because it was technically not a “final agency action” for the purposes of APA analysis. “Revenue Procedure 2016-22 is an internal procedural rule that does not create or determine any rights, obligations or legal consequences,” she wrote.
Facebook, Beeler added, also cannot challenge the IRS decision denying the appeal because that, too, is not a final agency action.
“Again, Facebook's argument to the contrary depends on its assumption that it had an enforceable right to take its tax case to IRS Appeals, and that the IRS's decision not to refer its case to IRS Appeal foreclosed that right,” she wrote. “But as described above, Facebook does not have this right.”
The IRS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readMeta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
Trending Stories
- 1Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
- 2Crypto Hacker’s $65 Million Scam Ends in Indictment
- 3Trump's Inspectors General Purge Could Make Policy Changes Easier, Observers Say
- 4Supporting Our Supreme Court Justices in the Guardianship Part
- 5'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250