Planned Parenthood Gets Win at Ninth Circuit In Case Over Anti-Abortion Videos
The panel affirmed a district court judge's ruling against the group's anti-SLAPP motion.
May 16, 2018 at 03:04 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Photo Credit: Jason Doiy/ALM
SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday rejected a bid by anti-abortion activists to block a fraud and racketeering suit by Planned Parenthood in a case centered on secretly recorded videos.
Writing for the unanimous panel, Circuit Judge Ronald Gould wrote that the district court properly denied an anti-SLAPP motion by the Center for Medical Progress, headed by anti-abortion activist David Daleiden, and other defendants.
Noting that the consistency between California's anti-SLAPP measure and federal rules of civil procedure has been “hotly disputed,” the panel concluded that U.S. District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California “did not err in declining to evaluate the factual sufficiency” of Planned Parenthood's complaint at the pleading stage.
Gould was joined in his decision by Circuit Judge Mary Murguia and Nancy Freudenthal, the chief district judge for the District of Wyoming, sitting by designation. Gould also authored a concurrence joined by Murguia in which he called on the Ninth Circuit to revisit en banc whether interlocutory appeals of anti-SLAPP decisions should be permitted.
Amy Bomse of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, who argued the case for Planned Parenthood, said she was pleased with the decision.
“These are defendants who lied and broke the law in order to spread malicious lies against Planned Parenthood,” Bomse said. “We're looking forward to having our case proceed to trial.”
Jeffrey Trissell of the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which represents the defendants, said they were disappointed with the ruling and evaluating how to move forward.
Planned Parenthood's case is nearly identical to a case brought by the National Abortion Federation, also pending in front of Orrick in San Francisco federal court.
The cases both center on videos that Daleiden and his co-operatives recorded after infiltrating meetings held by the two groups, which purported to show abortion providers discussing the sale of fetal tissue. The groups say the videos were manipulated to give that false portrayal.
The U.S. Supreme Court last month declined to overturn an injunction against Troy Newman, president of the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue Inc., and Daleiden barring them from releasing the footage taken at National Abortion Federation meetings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPolsinelli Hires Data Privacy, Tech Transactions Partner From Kirkland & Ellis
Many Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readQuantum Computing Company to Part With General Counsel
California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250