State Bar's Chief Trial Counsel Withdraws from Confirmation Process
Steven Moawad, the California state bar's chief trial counsel, has withdrawn his nomination from the state Senate, effectively ending his tenure as the agency's top prosecutor.
May 18, 2018 at 07:21 PM
4 minute read
Sacramento State Capitol building on Capitol Way. Credit: Jason Doiy/ Recorder
Steven Moawad, the California state bar's chief trial counsel, has withdrawn his nomination from the state Senate, effectively ending his tenure as the agency's top prosecutor.
The bar hired Moawad, a long time prosecutor in Contra Costa County, in April 2017 with hopes of bring stability to a job that in recent years has been plagued by legislative scrutiny, labor discord and turnover. But his appointment to lead the Office of Chief Trial Counsel, or OCTC, was never brought up for a required confirmation vote by the state Senate.
State bar president Michael Colantuono announced Moawad's withdrawal in a statement at the end of a trustees' meeting Friday.
“I'm grateful to Steve Moawad for his dedicated service to the state bar's office of chief trial counsel over the last year. Under Steve's leadership OCTC has accomplished important reforms and navigated significant transitions, while also improving employee morale and putting public protection at the center of our work,” Colantuono said.
Moawad was unavailable for an interview Friday, a bar spokeswoman said.
Moawad's nomination was torpedoed by lawmakers' concerns with two issues, according to two sources familiar with the confirmation process.
In March, a former forensic accountant in the Contra Costa County district attorney's office sued Moawad, former DA Mark Peterson, another DA employee and the county. The plaintiff, a Muslim, accused the defendants of religiously profiling him and subjecting him to extra security screenings when entering courtrooms. The defendants on Friday filed a motion to dismiss with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Neither Moawad nor bar leaders have addressed the lawsuit's specific allegations, although Colantuono issued a statement after the complaint was filed backing the chief trial counsel's Senate confirmation.
“Under his leadership, the Office of Chief Trial Counsel is fully engaged with the State Bar's public protection mission,” Colantuono said then. “I am especially pleased with his outreach to immigrant communities and Californians whose primary language is not English.”
Some lawmakers raised questions about how the bar's disciplinary office under Moawad handled complaints that a lawyer serving immigrant clients had alerted U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to their undocumented status, the sources said. The bar does not acknowledge the existence of complaints against lawyers unless charges are filed, and a spokeswoman declined to comment on the specific allegations.
The chief trial counsel's office concluded that the lawyer's conduct did not run afoul of laws that were on the books at the time, sources said.
The job of the bar's chief disciplinarian has been a perilous one in recent years, as the agency struggled with a chronic backlog of attorney complaints and legislative criticism that it should be more aggressive in punishing bad lawyers and those practicing law without a license. James Towery resigned less than a year into the job amid talk of a power struggle with then-executive director Joe Dunn. Kim was hired as the bar's new “sheriff.” But she, too, left after employees gave her a vote of “no confidence” in October 2015.
The union representing state bar workers issued a public letter of support for Moawad in March.
“Under the leadership of Mr. Moawad, we are hopeful that politics and division will finally take a backseat to serving the people of California and preventing attorney misconduct,” wrote Kim Kasreliovich, the president of the union.
Colantuono's statement Friday said Moawad will continue serving as chief trial counsel until May 31 at which point he will assume a “senior role” with the bar, reporting to the executive director. Melanie Lawrence, an attorney with the office since 2005, will take on the role of interim chief trial counsel on June 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPolsinelli Hires Data Privacy, Tech Transactions Partner From Kirkland & Ellis
Many Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readQuantum Computing Company to Part With General Counsel
California-Based Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250