Ninth Circuit Adopts #MeToo Recommendations Against Sexual Harassment
The chief judge said the goal is to make policies and procedures more accessible, understandable and effective.
May 21, 2018 at 05:01 PM
3 minute read
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has taken steps to improve its workplace rules after the #MeToo movement swept through the federal court last December.
Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas announced on Monday that the federal appeals court has accepted several recommendations from a special committee he convened in December to look into workplace policies and procedures for employees.
Chief Judge Sidney Thomas.
“In an effort to promote and safeguard a healthy working environment, our goal is to make our policies and procedures more accessible, more understandable and more effective,” he said.
The adopted changes include establishing a director of workplace relations to oversee workplace issues that arise within the Ninth Circuit courts and provide “discrimination and sexual harassment training,” according to the release by the appeals court.
The release noted that employees, starting in October, will have 180 days to bring a complaint under a revised employment dispute resolution policy, instead of the existing 30-day window.
Other recommendations appear to be aimed at making it easier for employees who have experienced sexual misconduct to come forward.
Changes included “reducing barriers to reporting workplace misconduct”, “providing multiple avenues for employees to seek informal advice on workplace issues” and giving the option of “assisted resolution of workplace disputes.”
The moves come after multiple women accused now-retired Judge Alex Kozinski of engaging in sexually inappropriate behavior. Many of the women worked directly under or with the judge.
Thomas later convened a “special ad hoc committee” to look into workplace issues. The committee, chaired by Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown, includes three other judges in the Ninth Circuit and one San Diego attorney.
“These recommendations are the result of a broad outreach effort over several months to both current and former law clerks and other court employees,” McKeown said. “There was an intensive effort to gather information and hear from court employees about workplace issues.”
The committee said that some of the recommendations came after the committee sent out a questionnaire to “almost 6,000 current and former employees” of the appeals court, other focus groups, and letters to law school deans “soliciting ideas for cooperation between the law schools and the courts with respect to law clerks and externs.”
Separately, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts also directed a working group last year to review the federal judiciary's procedures “for investigating and correcting inappropriate behavior” in the U.S. courts. That report is expected to be released later this month.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBlake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
4 minute readSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readThe end of the 'Rust' criminal case against Alec Baldwin may unlock a civil lawsuit
Trending Stories
- 1Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
- 2‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
- 3A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells and the Stories That Shaped Africa This Year
- 4Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
- 5Phila. Judge Upholds $68.5M Verdict Over Construction Worker's Death
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250