Dave Jones Sues AG Rival Becerra Over Courthouse Campaign Ad
“The campaign applied for and obtained a permit from the California Film Commission to film at the courthouse by going through the same legal process that is available to everyone," a lawyer for Becerra said in a statement. Becerra's team called the Jones lawsuit "baseless and frivolous."
May 24, 2018 at 07:39 PM
4 minute read
Xavier Becerra's Democratic rival for attorney general, Dave Jones, on Thursday broadened his attack, alleging in a new suit that the incumbent misused a working courtroom in Sacramento as a campaign ad backdrop.
Jones' lawsuit mirrors similar complaints Monday with the Fair Political Practices Commission and the Attorney General's Office. Jones claims Becerra violated state law barring campaign activities in public buildings when his campaign shot campaign footage inside the Stanley Mosk Library and Courts Building. The five-story complex is home to the Third District Court of Appeal, including its historic courtroom.
Becerra did not address the lawsuit during a press conference called Thursday afternoon to decry proposed Trump administration restrictions on federally funded family planning services.
Becerra campaign attorney Stephen Kaufman of the Kaufman Legal Group called the lawsuit “baseless and frivolous.”
“The campaign applied for and obtained a permit from the California Film Commission to film at the courthouse by going through the same legal process that is available to everyone,” Kaufman said in a statement. “The law cited by Jones does not apply where a candidate uses a public forum that is available to anyone else on the same terms.”
Jones' complaint, filed by his lawyers at Nossaman, seeks damages tied to the costs of shooting and airing the ads—a figure he put at more than $2 million—as well as a judge's order that Becerra stop airing the four campaign ads showing the courthouse.
“The conversion of a state courtroom into a film set, in lieu of recreating a courtroom scene through purchasing scene materials with campaign funds, provided the campaign with a significant monetary gain,” according to the complaint, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
The filming of the ads, completed over a single day in April, raised questions about the use of public courtrooms for political purposes. A production company working for the Becerra campaign obtained a permit for the shoot from the California Film Commission, even though the commission's website, at the time, said “filming requests for appellate courtrooms located within state office buildings will not be considered.”
After Jones filed his complaint Monday, the website language was revised to say: “One exception is the 3rd District Appellate Court in Sacramento. Permit requests for this property should be submitted to the CFC.”
In an email Tuesday, commission executive director Amy Lemisch said the initial website information was correct “with regard to filming exclusions in appellate courtrooms that are under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Council.” The Mosk building is owned and operated by the state.
“In this case, approval for filming was granted by the Capitol Permit Office and the permit was processed by the California Film Commission in accordance with standard procedures and protocols,” Lemisch said.
The production company working for Becerra's campaign also applied to the Judicial Council to use the appellate court for “a short spot with Attorney General Xavier Becerra and Governor Jerry Brown.” The application was signed “approved” on April 26, the day of the filming, by Andrea Rohmann, the court executive officer for the Third District. A judicial branch spokesman said the application was collected “for information purposes only” and was not forwarded to the Judicial Council.
The court was not in session on the day footage for the 30-second ads were shot.
Vance Raye, administrative presiding justice of the Third District, said Tuesday that he did not know about the ads until shortly before crews started shooting them.
“They didn't come to me for the keys,” Raye said.
Asked if he was concerned about a political ad being shot in the courtroom, Raye said “that's one way to look at it.” But, he added, “If you're going to allow it to happen, if you're going to make it available to everyone involved and it doesn't inconvenience the court at all, then maybe it's OK.”
Becerra and Jones, both Democrats, lead the four-man race for attorney general in terms of fundraising and likely name recognition given that they both hold statewide offices.
A Jones campaign spokeswoman said the candidate filed suit in Los Angeles because the ads reached the biggest audience there. The lawsuit was filed by Nossaman attorneys Lloyd Pellman, Amber Maltbie and Alexander Suarez.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
5 minute read$15K Family Vacation Turned 'Colossal Nightmare': Lawsuit Filed Against Vail Ski Resorts
Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Del. Courts to Address in 2025
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250