Timing Isn't Always Everything
While an opportunity may seem like it's “once in a lifetime,” it is unprofessional to bail too early into your tenure with a new organization.
May 25, 2018 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
A: In this circumstance … yes. While a “once in a lifetime” opportunity comes around … well, once in a lifetime, it would be unprofessional to bail so early into your tenure with your organization.
No reasonable employer expects its employees to stay forever (anymore). But there is an expectation that an employee will be committed to stay for a “reasonable” period of time once s/he accepts an offer of employment. So what is reasonable anyway? The minimum length of time to stay in a position—which the market and employers generally accept as reasonable, is two years (which has decreased significantly over the past 15-20 years). Less than two years can reach reasonable status in some circumstances, but anything less than a year can leave a negative impression on you, your character and the size of your wings. Of course, there are always exceptions, but not many that leave a boss giving a lawyer a warm and fuzzy bon voyage.
Does this situation fall into one of those special exceptions? No. You mention that this newly presented position is a once in a lifetime opportunity. But you don't have enough information to know how compelling it actually is or is not. A conversation or two with a recruiter does not suffice. Even if it is fabulous, this fact isn't compelling enough to outweigh the strength of your new commitment to your current employer. In addition, you like your new job. So what is driving you to consider leaving a job you already enjoy? This “grass is greener” mentality is flawed and almost always results in a compromised career and reputation.
In your situation, you have given your employer a commitment. Your word. In return, your colleagues have invested time and their own commitment to you as a new team member. The organization has also bypassed other candidates in favor of choosing you. Part of that decision involved an expectation and reliance that you would not immediately leave for the next best thing that came your way. While you are not legally obligated to stay, a strong professional value system would dictate that you do.
Seemingly great job opportunities are tempting to explore further. And in most circumstances, it would behoove you to take a closer look. But when tenure with your current employer is only a few months, you're better off looking the other way. So stay put and focus on succeeding in your new role. There will be more once in a lifetime opportunities to come. I promise.
Julie Brush is the founder and author of The Lawyer Whisperer (www.thelawyerwhisperer.com), a career advice column for legal professionals, also found on LinkedIn. She is co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, a legal search/consulting boutique firm, serving as a strategic adviser to lawyers, law firms and corporations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250