Welcome to the GDPR: Complaints Lobbed at Facebook, Google That Could Carry Billions in Penalties
"None of Your Business," an EU organization headed by Austrian privacy lawyer and activist Max Schrems, has filed four separate complaints against the U.S. tech giants alleging they are forcing users to consent to new privacy policies with an "all or nothing" approach.
May 25, 2018 at 02:49 PM
3 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — Just after the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation took effect Friday, Austrian privacy lawyer and activist Max Schrems filed a spate of complaints against Facebook and Google alleging they're willfully violating the law and should be fined billions of euros.
The four similar complaints were filed with data privacy regulators in separate EU countries on behalf of users in those jurisdictions. The complaints target the privacy policies of Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and Google's Android, and allege that users are being forced to give consent to their data being collected in violation of the GDPR.
“Facebook has even blocked accounts of users who have not given consent. In the end users only had the choice to delete the account or hit the 'agree' button,” Schrems said in a statement. He said that was not a “free choice” but more akin to “a North Korean election process.”
The complaints specifically target a practice known as “bundling,” under which users are asked to give consent for their data to be used in a range of ways in order to continue to use the service. This method, the complaints allege, renders user consent invalid, “as such consent would not be in any way 'specific,' but rather based on an 'all or nothing' approach.”
With the GDPR carrying a maximum penalty of 4 percent of a company's global revenue, Schrems calculated Google could be on the hook for 3.7 billion euros, and Facebook for 3.9 billion euros — 1.3 billion euros each for Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram.
In the statement, he called the complaints a “crucial test” of whether the GDPR's new penalties will really have any “teeth.”
Schrems has long been a thorn in the side of Facebook and U.S. tech companies. While still a law student, he filed a complaint against the social media giant that ultimately led to the U.S.-EU “Safe Harbor” framework for data transfers being struck down by the EU's top court. Another related case he filed is still pending.
The GDPR complaints were put together by a new nonprofit organization Schrems create, called “None of Your Business,” or NOYB.
In response to the complaints, Facebook chief privacy officer Erin Egan said the company had “prepared for the past 18 months to ensure we meet the requirements of the GDPR.” She added that the company had made Facebook's policies clearer, its privacy settings easier to find, and made it easier for users to access, download and delete their data.
Google offered a similar statement. “We build privacy and security into our products from the very earliest stages and are committed to complying with the EU General Data Protection Regulation,” it said. “Over the last 18 months, we have taken steps to update our products, policies and processes to provide users with meaningful data transparency and control across all the services that we provide in the EU.”
The complaints are now in the hands of the data protection authorities in France, Belgium, Germany and Austria. In a statement, NOYB said that the Irish data regulator would also likely get involved, given that Facebook's EU headquarters are in Ireland.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllX Faces Scrutiny as EU Investigates Possible Breach of Content Moderation Standards
3 minute readSemiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
3 minute readGoogle Lawyer, EU Official Comment on New Chapter in EU Competition Policy
2 minute readEx-Top Disney Lawyer Joins Directors UK as It Opens Royalty Talks With US Media Giants
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250