Ninth Circuit Pumps the Brakes on Facebook Biometric Trial
The Ninth Circuit has granted an emergency motion by Facebook Inc. in its bid to defeat a privacy class action over biometric data.
May 29, 2018 at 03:51 PM
2 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has put the brakes on a class action privacy lawsuit against Facebook Inc. that had been set to go to trial in July.
In an order signed by Ninth Circuit Judges William Fletcher and Consuelo Callahan Tuesday, the court granted an emergency motion for interlocutory review of an April class certification ruling. That ruling certified a class of Illinois Facebook users bringing claims under the state's Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) over Facebook's photo scanning technology.
The judge presiding over the case is U.S. District Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California. Lawyers for Facebook at Mayer Brown had asked Donato to delay the trial, set to begin July 9, so they could seek Ninth Circuit review. But Donato earlier on Tuesday refused that request.
In the underlying lawsuit, plaintiffs claim Facebook's “tag suggestions” feature, a tool launched in 2011 that prompts users with possible matches of friends to identify in uploaded pictures BIPA requires companies to get permission before storing personal identifiers like fingerprints and face and retina scans and disclose how they use them.
The law carries statutory damages of $1,000 for each negligent violation, and $5,000 for those that are “intentional and reckless,” meaning that a verdict against Facebook could hit the company with billions in damages. Facebook had the backing of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in seeking interlocutory review.
Plaintiffs are represented in the case by Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd and Labaton Sucharow. Paul Gelller of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd said in an email statement that while he was looking forward to trial in July, he was still confident that his clients would get their day in court. “This is just one more hurdle we have to clear,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Nothing Is Good for the Consumer Right Now': Experts Weigh Benefits, Drawbacks of Updated Real Estate Commission Policies
Federal Judge Denies Build-A-Bear Workshop's Motion to Dismiss 'Squishmallow' Copyright Infringement Suit
Trending Stories
- 1US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 2Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 3African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 4Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 5Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250