McGregor Scott's Pot Policies Track Obama-Era 'Cole Memo'
"The reality of the situation is that there is so much black-market marijuana in California that we could go after just the black market and never get there," Scott says. His office priorities focus on illegal grows on federal land, drug cartels and interstate trafficking.
May 29, 2018 at 08:50 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. attorney for California's Eastern District said Tuesday he is focusing on shutting down illegal marijuana grows, not state-licensed operations.
In some of his first public comments on the state of cannabis enforcement in California, McGregor Scott outlined priorities that hew closely to those detailed in the now-rescinded Obama-era “Cole memo”: illegal grows on federal land, cartels dealing in marijuana and interstate trafficking.
McGregor Scott“The reality of the situation is that there is so much black-market marijuana in California that we could go after just the black market and never get there,” Scott told reporters in Sacramento at a multi-agency discussion about how illegal grows on public land affect the environment.
“Right now our priorities are to focus on what have historically been our law enforcement priorities. … This issue, the public lands issues, obviously touches on all three of those,” said Scott, a former Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner who earlier ran the U.S. attorney's office during the George W. Bush administration.
The prosecutor's informal guidance is similar to more detailed priorities outlined recently by Oregon U.S. Attorney Billy Williams. Like Scott, Williams would not specifically rule out charging state-legal operations with federal drug law violations. But he did say his office would target illegal grows abusing pesticides, diverting water and generating violence.
California's 34-county Eastern District stretches from Kern County north to the Oregon border. It covers 87,000 square miles, of which 45 percent is federal land. Illegal grows in public forests and their resulting damage to watersheds and wildlife have been a problem in California long before state voters approved regulated marijuana cultivation and sales in 2016. Law enforcement seized 1.4 million marijuana plants last year on federal lands in California, the most by far of any state, according to the U.S. Forest Service.
The problem has only worsened in recent years, Scott said, as drug cartels have smuggled U.S.-banned chemicals to grow sites to kill plant-eating animals. State marijuana legalization has not had much effect either way, he said.
“There is a manifest black market in California,” Scott said. “It is of biblical proportions and what we're talking about here today is a classic example of that market—people who have no intent of ever entering the legal system that has been created and California has attempted to establish.”
The federal government has appropriated $2.5 million to the Forest Service to eradicate illegal grows; 90 percent of that money will go to California, Scott said. Eastern District prosecutors have charged black-market growers with environmental degradation as well as drug crimes. But those prosecutions have been hampered by federal laws that make the environmental crimes misdemeanors, not felonies, Scott said.
“We need to change the laws in that regard so that felonies can be brought … because of the severe nature of the damage and the threat that they pose,” he said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
6 minute readBlake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
4 minute readSolana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250