McGregor Scott's Pot Policies Track Obama-Era 'Cole Memo'
"The reality of the situation is that there is so much black-market marijuana in California that we could go after just the black market and never get there," Scott says. His office priorities focus on illegal grows on federal land, drug cartels and interstate trafficking.
May 29, 2018 at 08:50 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. attorney for California's Eastern District said Tuesday he is focusing on shutting down illegal marijuana grows, not state-licensed operations.
In some of his first public comments on the state of cannabis enforcement in California, McGregor Scott outlined priorities that hew closely to those detailed in the now-rescinded Obama-era “Cole memo”: illegal grows on federal land, cartels dealing in marijuana and interstate trafficking.
McGregor Scott“The reality of the situation is that there is so much black-market marijuana in California that we could go after just the black market and never get there,” Scott told reporters in Sacramento at a multi-agency discussion about how illegal grows on public land affect the environment.
“Right now our priorities are to focus on what have historically been our law enforcement priorities. … This issue, the public lands issues, obviously touches on all three of those,” said Scott, a former Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner who earlier ran the U.S. attorney's office during the George W. Bush administration.
The prosecutor's informal guidance is similar to more detailed priorities outlined recently by Oregon U.S. Attorney Billy Williams. Like Scott, Williams would not specifically rule out charging state-legal operations with federal drug law violations. But he did say his office would target illegal grows abusing pesticides, diverting water and generating violence.
California's 34-county Eastern District stretches from Kern County north to the Oregon border. It covers 87,000 square miles, of which 45 percent is federal land. Illegal grows in public forests and their resulting damage to watersheds and wildlife have been a problem in California long before state voters approved regulated marijuana cultivation and sales in 2016. Law enforcement seized 1.4 million marijuana plants last year on federal lands in California, the most by far of any state, according to the U.S. Forest Service.
The problem has only worsened in recent years, Scott said, as drug cartels have smuggled U.S.-banned chemicals to grow sites to kill plant-eating animals. State marijuana legalization has not had much effect either way, he said.
“There is a manifest black market in California,” Scott said. “It is of biblical proportions and what we're talking about here today is a classic example of that market—people who have no intent of ever entering the legal system that has been created and California has attempted to establish.”
The federal government has appropriated $2.5 million to the Forest Service to eradicate illegal grows; 90 percent of that money will go to California, Scott said. Eastern District prosecutors have charged black-market growers with environmental degradation as well as drug crimes. But those prosecutions have been hampered by federal laws that make the environmental crimes misdemeanors, not felonies, Scott said.
“We need to change the laws in that regard so that felonies can be brought … because of the severe nature of the damage and the threat that they pose,” he said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readGirardi's Lawyers Move for New Trial: He Doesn't Remember Jury's Verdict
6 minute readHuggies Baby Wipes Accused of Containing Toxic Levels of 'Forever Chemicals'
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250