Former Bingham Partner Sues Cotchett Firm and Ex-Partner Claiming They Botched Multimillion-Dollar Compensation Case
Former Bingham partner Michael DiSanto claims that Cotchett and former partner Philip Gregory mishandled an arbitration where he was seeking millions of dollars in unpaid guaranteed compensation from the firm. He lost counterclaims forcing him to hand over stock units from his prior employer to Bingham.
June 01, 2018 at 05:16 PM
4 minute read
A former Bingham McCutchen partner has slapped his former lawyers at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy with a multimillion-dollar professional negligence lawsuit, claiming they mishandled an arbitration where he was seeking millions in unpaid compensation guarantees from his old law firm.
In a complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court on May 24, lawyers for former Bingham partner Michael DiSanto claims he had a written agreement with the firm that guaranteed him $2.5 million in annual compensation from when he joined in March 2013 through 2015, and at least $1.5 million in 2016, including salary and bonus.
According to the complaint, DiSanto hired the Cotchett firm and Philip Gregory, then a partner at Cotchett, shortly after DiSanto says he was terminated without cause in November 2014. Gregory was hired to pursue claims in arbitration against Bingham for failure to make good on the compensation agreement. DiSanto claims Gregory and the firm negligently mishandled his case and lost counterclaims that resulted in him having to hand over stock units he had been awarded by his prior employer, Maker Studios, where he previously served as general counsel.
DiSanto is seeking at least $3 million dollars for claims of professional negligence and breach of fiduciary duty against Gregory and Cotchett regarding his affirmative claims against Bingham and at least $3.7 million stemming from the loss on the stock counterclaims, according to the complaint.
Neither Gregory, who left Cotchett to start his own firm in February, nor name partner Joseph Cotchett immediately responded to multiple requests for comment on the allegations in the lawsuit.
According to his LinkedIn page, DiSanto is currently the chief administrative and legal officer at Limelight Networks. He also has stints at Dinsmore & Shohl, Reed Smith, Morrison & Foerster, Shearman & Sterling and the firm now known as Cooley on his LinkedIn resume. He was let go from Bingham the same month that roughly 750 lawyers and staffers from the firm were absorbed into Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
According to the lawsuit, the defendants' work for DiSanto “fell below the standard of care.” DiSanto claims that Cotchett and Gregory failed to pursue discovery or interview potential witnesses that would have been beneficial to his claims against the firm, including other Bingham partners or the firm's head of recruiting who allegedly knew about his guaranteed compensation agreement. DiSanto claims that it was him and not his lawyers who contacted the recruiter he worked with when joining Bingham to get a declaration regarding his deal with the firm.
“Defendants did not allocate sufficient resources to handle plaintiff's matter competently,” Disanto's lawyers wrote. “Gregory did not, and on information and belief, was unable to, allocate a sufficient level of time and attention to be able to before consistently with the standard of care. This problem was exacerbated by defendants' failure to adequately staff plaintiff's case.”
DiSanto claims that the defendants' work product was “shoddy, poorly written, omitted important arguments and evidence” and was often only given to him to review at the last minute. He also said that his lawyer failed to prepare him to testify and didn't object to Bingham's counterclaims on the basis that the parties hadn't attempted to mediate them first as required.
“The failure by defendants to timely and properly assert this objection deprived plaintiff of the opportunity to settle the matter before an interim award was entered against him,” DiSanto's lawyers wrote.
DiSanto claims that the restricted stock units granted to him by Maker Studios rightfully belonged to him, but that the defendants failed to procure discovery and witnesses at his old employer to defend against Bingham's counterclaims.
DiSanto is represented by Asim Bhansali and Kate Lazarus of Kwun Bhansali Lazarus. DiSanto, Bhansali and Lazarus, who left Keker, Van Nest & Peters last month to launch a litigation boutique with colleague Michael Kwun, didn't immediately respond to messages.
Likewise, DiSanto didn't immediately respond to a message left at his office on Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Patent Innovators Can Look to International Trade Commission Enforcement for Protection, IP Lawyers Say
Attorney of the Year Finalist: Michael Rubin, Latham & Watkins
John Hueston Appointed Monitor by CA Court Judge in Ruling on Veterans' Housing Case
Ex-Federal Prosecutor and White-Collar Defense Lawyer Joins Foundation Law Group
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250