Recruiters Among the First to See Effects of Sexual Misconduct on Lawyers' Careers
From gossip about workplace culture to stories about individual law firm partners, tales of inappropriate conduct regularly reach the ears of professional legal recruiters.
June 01, 2018 at 01:16 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
In the legal industry's whisper network—where allegations of sexual misconduct are quietly spread, but rarely amplified—the whispers often land in the ears of legal recruiters. Several legal recruiters who spoke with The American Lawyer, an affiliate of The Recorder, said they had heard stories of sexual misconduct at law firms through their work with lateral candidates. How recently and how frequently they had heard the stories varied, as did the nature and severity of the allegations they heard. A few recruiters said they have worked with young lawyers who said they were leaving a firm, at least in part, to flee ongoing sexual harassment or generally inappropriate behavior by a partner. Multiple recruiters also said they had encountered a lawyer who didn't want to be placed at a particular firm or move along with a particular group, because they would have to work closely with a partner there who made them uncomfortable before or who had a reputation for sexual misconduct. “That type of stuff doesn't get out on the street without some reasons for it,” said Jack Hopper of Kinney Recruiting. |
Impetus for a Move
Sabina Lippman, co-founder of Lippman Jungers, said she remembers coming across a young lawyer who felt the need to change firms in order to make partner, because he knew the associate he was competing against had a sexual relationship with the senior partner in the practice. Lippman also recalled a partner who had numerous affairs with associates—the behavior had put an end to multiple marriages. “Some of the reports of this stuff may be the result of just really clumsy dating activity,” said Robert Kinney of Kinney Recruiting. In a recent survey of Am Law 100 firms, only 13 acknowledged having policies and guidelines for relationships between partners, associates and staff. Kinney said he worked with a candidate years ago who said she needed to make a lateral move because she had a sexual relationship with a partner at her previous firm, and they broke up. He said he also heard of a female law firm partner who made a lateral move after hitting on a summer associate. Hopper said he remembers a candidate who felt the need to leave because the head of her practice group regularly made inappropriate gestures. The recruiters' accounts are similar to some of the examples listed in a recent editorial by The American Lawyer's Young Lawyer Editorial Board. “Some may view comments related to sexuality as workplace gossip or harmless flirting,” the board wrote. “But young lawyers who are vigilant about career advancement and rightly concerned about personal safety, scrutinize and react to this unprofessional behavior through their career choices, which are often detrimental to the victim and the firm.” |
Tip of the Iceberg?
Despite what they have heard, recruiters said there is likely much more going on that goes untold. Dan Scott, of Angott Search Group in Michigan, noted that a lot of behavior that would understandably create discomfort might not be seen as actionable, so it “doesn't raise to the level where you would hear about it.” Sexual misconduct is “an issue that's as prevalent in the legal workforce as it is in the rest of the workforce,” Scott said. “The distinct difference is partners with books of business can somehow get away with things that people in other industries would not be able to.” Kinney said the allegations come up from time to time, but there may be more instances where candidates are “wise enough not to tell us.” Candidates often don't want to talk about why they're leaving a firm, recruiters said, and if a candidate does disclose to their recruiter that sexual misconduct drove them to make a move, they certainly don't want their potential new firm to know. “Lawyers by nature don't want to say something unless they can back it up with incontrovertible evidence,” said one Pennsylvania recruiter, who asked not to be named. And since many recruiters are focusing their work on equity partners with large books of business, they may not hear from victims of sexual misconduct directly. Lippman noted that women still make up a small percentage of all law firm equity partners—and firms looking to hire at the partner level will more likely hire someone who is already an equity partner. Even those who have been in the industry for a while may have trouble moving laterally, said Frank D'Amore, of Attorney Career Catalysts in Philadelphia. “It's harder for people in professional services industries, especially in a law firm, to be as mobile,” D'Amore said. “Unless they have portable business, it's much harder for them to pick up and move.” Instead, he said, lawyers who can no longer stand some kind of inappropriate behavior often go in-house or to a government position. “The consequences of this from a career perspective are significant,” D'Amore said. Even when law firms get enough apparent evidence about a lawyer's sexual misconduct to take action, they may be in a tough spot. Pillsbury's dispute with former partner Frode Jensen in 2002 is a cautionary tale. The firm issued a press release after Jensen left, stating that his departure came on the heels of sexual assault allegations that involved Jensen. Jensen then sued the firm for defamation; the suit settled confidentially in 2003. Recruiters are in a tough spot too when they hear stories about lawyers or law firms, whether presented as idle gossip or something more serious. Multiple recruiters said they simply wouldn't work with a candidate whom they knew had been accused of sexual misconduct. But the more difficult question is whether to share unproven allegations with law firm clients. “The last thing I would ever want to find out was there was some story on the street [about a candidate] … then the client made the hire,” Kinney said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudges Say Social Media and Political Polarization Puts Them in Danger
These Am Law 100 Law Firms Are Expanding Their New York Footprints
DOJ's Visa Antitrust Suit Hands Class Action Lawyers New Line of Attack Against Payments Giant
FTC Goes After AI Tool That Has Capability to Mass Produce Fake Reviews
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250