Nonprofit Program Seeks to Mentor Next Generation of Women Lawyers
Women leaders in technology law are trying to tackle a pipeline problem by hosting a two-day program to introduce 30 high school students and graduates to legal career opportunities in the Bay Area.
June 15, 2018 at 01:50 PM
5 minute read
What does it take to become a successful female lawyer? ChIPs Network Inc., a San Francisco-based nonprofit organization focused on advancing and connecting women in technology, law and policy, recently hosted a two-day program to introduce 30 high school students and graduates to women lawyers and judges in the Bay Area. During the two-day affair, teenagers had a chance to go inside the courtroom, visit leading technology companies and spend time at a global law firm to interact with women who offered insights into the inner workings of the legal profession. "Over the years, I had a quite a few high school girls referred to me, whether through a parent or a teacher, wanting to learn more about careers in law," said ChIPs co-founder and CEO Mallun Yen, herself a co-founder and COO of business-to-business software community SaaStr. ChIPs, shorthand for Chiefs in Intellectual Property, was originally founded in 2005 by seven female IP leaders from major technology companies in Silicon Valley as a forum where women IP lawyers could meet with one another. It now has more than 3,000 members and nine regional chapters in the U.S. and abroad. As a former chief in-house IP counsel at Cisco Systems Inc., Yen said she was once the only lawyer that most young women would know. As a result, she and other ChIPs members launched the Advocacy, Leadership and Innovation program, or ALI, to provide the opportunities that allow young women to have a real-world look at what lawyers actually do on a daily basis. "The purpose is not only to give them a first-hand look at cutting-edge cases like Waymo v. Uber or visits to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to learn about patents," she said. "But [it's] equally important to expose them to the many brilliant women leaders in our profession." At a panel hosted earlier this week by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in San Francisco, eight female lawyers with diverse backgrounds and practices shared their personal stories about their career paths, as well as the challenges and opportunities they encountered along the way. Former U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, who has been a trial lawyer for over three decades and once served as head of litigation at Orrick, told the participants that the legal industry's attitude toward female lawyers has improved over the years, as more women have been elevated to leadership positions. "I did see a huge shift in the years that I was a lawyer from 1987 to 2010, when I took this role [as U.S. attorney], I think that we came a long way," Haag said. "They treated me with respect and I treated them with respect back, and it worked, but it didn't come without a lot of years of evolution." Amanda Galton, co-leader of Orrick's global technology companies group, shared her experience working with high-tech companies and entrepreneurs that are reinventing the way many people live. Galton said she serves as both a "psychologist and lawyer" for such clients, helping to smooth the way for them to build and grow faster. When asked by some participants whether a technical degree is needed for an IP practice, Annette Hurst, a high-profile IP litigator and member of Orrick's board of directors, said, "If I had to do it all over again, I would get a technical degree. At the end of the day, it would help me go farther." Amy Van Zant, another IP litigator who joined Orrick in 2015 from Covington & Burling, has an educational background in history and philosophy. She told the students that it is still possible to practice IP law without a technical degree, but it's important to hone the skill that can explain complex technologies in plain language. Van Zant noted that jobs such as being a waitress in a restaurant can help students prepare for a career in Big Law, since much of a lawyer's work is to serve clients, while presumably keeping them happy. Other pieces of advice discussed by the Orrick panel included mentorship and work-life balance. Those who participated agreed on the most important lesson—for young women to follow their passion and do what they love to do. Isabel DeCastro, a 17-year-old headed to college at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said her biggest takeaway from the presentation at Orrick is "to do something you love, to find something you love, to reach out." This is the third year that ChIPs has been running its program in the Bay Area. The group of young women hosted by the nonprofit got to experience firsthand interactions with in-house lawyers from robotics and artificial intelligence startup Anki, Dropbox Inc. and Salesforce.com Inc. The ChIPs group has also met with U.S. District Judge Susan Illston of the Northern District of California and saw litigators in action as they conducted mock arguments of IP cases in U.S. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim's courtroom. The program ended with a law school panel discussion at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. ChIPs also announced this week the launch of a new $5,000 scholarship named after Rachel Krevans, a veteran IP litigator at Morrison & Foerster who died last year at 60. The scholarship is for women law students interested in pursuing a career in IP law. (All photos by Jason Doiy/ALM)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Legal Tech M&As That Changed the Legal Tech Market in 2023
Embracing Innovation: 7 Major Law Firm Tech Developments in 2023
A Hoteling Success Story? A Look Inside Farella's New San Francisco Office
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 2GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 3Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 4'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 5The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250