Ex-Partner Accuses Jones Day of 'Fraternity' Environment, Gender Bias
Jones Day is the latest large law firm to face claims of gender discrimination. Wendy Moore, now a partner at Perkins Coie, alleges in a new suit that her former firm operates as a boys' club and marginalizes women.
June 19, 2018 at 03:47 PM
4 minute read
Executive compensation lawyer Wendy Moore has accused her former law firm Jones Day of sex discrimination, alleging in a representative action in San Francisco state court that the firm runs as a “fraternity” and maintains a black box pay system that has led to gender disparities.
Moore, who joined Perkins Coie as a partner in Palo Alto earlier this year after about five years at Jones Day, alleges that her former law firm violated California's equal pay law and the state's Labor Code through “systematic gender discrimination in compensation.” The suit was brought as a representative action under the California Private Attorneys General Act on behalf of Moore and other “aggrieved” employees.
“Jones Day operates as a fraternity,” the complaint said. “Male senior partners mentor male associates and assist them in climbing the ranks to partnership. They pass the firm's business through male-centered social events focused on athletics. Female attorneys are treated as second-class citizens. They are not, nor can they be, full members in the fraternity.”
A team from Sanford Heisler Sharp, led by firm chairman David Sanford, represents Moore; Sanford and his firm have also been at the helm of several other recent gender discrimination actions brought against current and former large law firms, including Ogletree, Deakins, Nash Smoak & Stewart, Proskauer Rose and Morrison & Foerster.
A Jones Day spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Among other specific details, Moore's complaint cited a recent financial disclosure from a former Jones Day sixth-year associate who joined the Trump administration. In that government disclosure, the associate listed a salary of $810,000 in 2015—about the same amount that Moore earned as a base salary as an eighth-year partner, according to the complaint.
More generally, the complaint alleged that a “boys club” pervades the culture at Jones Day and that male firm partners often make sexist comments and rate female colleagues based on their physical attractiveness. That environment, the suit alleged, leads female lawyers to be “undervalued and marginalized,” and sets up a “patronage” system in which younger male lawyers receive more business development opportunities and other kinds of support than their female peers.
The suit also takes aim at Jones Day's “black box” pay system, alleging that, as a result of it and the firm's overall male-dominated culture, a small group of influential male partners control all compensation decisions. Lawyers at the firm, meanwhile, are encouraged to refrain from discussing their pay, according to the complaint.
“This system lacks sufficient quality controls, implementation metrics, transparency and oversight,” the complaint said. “Unsurprisingly, the outcome of this system is that these male leaders systematically undervalue female attorneys, pay them less than their male counterparts, and provide no avenues to female attorneys to inquire about their pay, much less learn how to increase it.”
Beyond allegations of a fraternity-like atmosphere and unfair pay, the complaint goes on to allege that Moore faced retaliation after speaking up within Jones Day about gender bias issues.
Although she had raised concerns several times during her tenure at Jones Day, Moore decided to hire Sanford in February after she was told not to come to the firm's all-partner meeting. Moore told the firm on Feb. 22 through her lawyers that she planned to pursue discrimination claims and, just six days later, received a letter saying her partnership had been terminated, according to the complaint. The firm allegedly refused to return some $337,500 in capital contributions Moore had made as a partner, and another $200,000 in compensation that she previously earned.
“Jones Day's message in terminating Wendy could not be clearer,” Sanford said in a statement announcing Moore's complaint against her former firm.
The suit also references the firm's past representation of Donald Trump—who bragged about groping women in an “Access Hollywood” video that surfaced during the 2016 presidential campaign—as a marker of the firm's male-dominated environment.
“Ms. Moore raised serious concerns about the firm's misogynist culture and its impact on her career, as well as the firm's support for now-President Donald Trump, a former firm client who has boasted about 'grab[bing women] by the pussy,' only to defend this comment as 'locker room talk,'” the complaint said. “Ms. Moore's complaints of gender discrimination were ultimately the cause of Jones Day's decision to terminate her.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
5 minute readSchools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250