Susman Godfrey Sets Starting Pay Set at $195K, Tops Cravath Scale for All Associates
The Houston-based litigation firm, which has an office in Los Angeles, once again exceeded the associate salary pay scale set by Cravath, Swaine & Moore, with increases of $5,000 at all levels.
June 25, 2018 at 07:00 AM
3 minute read
Elite litigation firm Susman Godfrey has taken the lead in the associate salary race, topping the new market rate set by Cravath, Swaine & Moore by $5,000 at each pay level. The first-year base pay rate at Susman Godfrey moves to $195,000, which is $5,000 more than Cravath's $190,000.
The firm's partners approved the new salary scale on June 23 while attending a retreat in Seattle.
Susman Godfrey has taken the lead in the past in associate salaries and bonuses. Two years ago, when Cravath set a new market rate of $180,000 for first-year lawyers effective July 1, 2016, Susman Godfrey moved to $190,000. And the firm paid larger year-end bonuses as well.
After approving the new scale, the firm notified its 43 associates of the salary increase with the following message:
“The partners are pleased to announce that effective July 1, Susman Godfrey associate salaries will be increased to an annual amount that will exceed the “Cravath scale” by $5,000 at every level of associate seniority.”
The partners also told its associates that the salary increases will not affect consideration of year-end bonuses. Cravath announced it would pay a special summer bonus ranging from $5,000 to $25,000. But Neal Manne, one of Susman Godfrey's managing partners, said the litigation boutique does not pay midyear bonuses. Manne said bonuses will be paid in December as usual and are likely to exceed bonuses paid by big New York firms.
On June 4, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy started the salary hikes by announcing a $190,000 starting salary for first-year associates. A week later, Cravath matched but agreed to pay more for mid-level and senior associates.
The Cravath scale ranges from a $190,000 base pay for the class of 2017 to $340,000 for associates in the class of 2010. The comparable new Susman Godfrey salaries are $195,000 to $345,000.
Manne said Susman Godfrey exceeded the new market scale because “our associates deserve it.”
The first-year associate compensation at Susman Godfrey largely applies to summer associates, since the firm requires all associates to do a federal clerkship as a condition of employment. That means that most of the associates would start work at the firm at the second-year level of $205,000 annually under the new scale.
In addition to paying at the top of the scale, the firm's partnership track is only six years, and five years for associates who clerked at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Susman Godfrey has offices in Houston, Los Angeles, New York and Seattle.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readAnapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute readPierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250