Judge Chhabria Is on a Mission in Patent Litigation
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria is shaking up some of the business-as-usual in patent litigation. Plus, highlights from next week's Federal Circuit calendar in this sneak preview of Skilled in the Art.
July 06, 2018 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
EDITOR'S NOTE: Skilled in the Art, Scott Graham. U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria ➤➤ Would you like to receive the next Skilled in the Art as an email? Sign up here.
|
Don't Get Too Confidential on Judge Chhabria – or Else
Judge Vince Chhabria wrote last week Nevro v. Boston Scientific Nevro Chhabria's patent cases The judge is clearly trying to shake up some of the business-as-usual in patent litigation Boston Scientific Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer That led to a painful hearing before Chhabria in April A&P partner Edward Han in many other jurisdictions sealed filings are routine issued his order
|
Who's Arguing?
mentioned Tuesday WARF v. Apple ➤ Google v. Personal Audio. Not so in this case. Apple Dan Bagatell, Perkins Coie's Federal Circuit practice Victor Hardy of Hardy, Parrish, Yang ➤ Intellectual Ventures v. T-Mobile and Ericsson. Chief Judge Leonard Stark Dechert litigation chief Martin Black Baker Botts partner Doug Kubehl ➤ Real Foods v. Frito-Lay America. CORN THINS RICE THINS its Facebook page should have gone further and declared the marks generic recent Coke Zero decision Norris McLaughlin & Marcus partner Jeanne Hamburg Pirkey Barber's Bill Barber
|
Adobe's Dana Rao on Diversity
Dana Rao Adobe Systems a Q&A with him Mike Dillon
|
Ninth Circuit Tries Again on Laches
outside of the Ninth and Federal circuits think that laches should be a defense in IP disputes? ruled against disagreed disagreed. laches still applies in trademark cases He's probably right
We hope you enjoyed this sample of Skilled in the Art. CLICK HERE to sign up or find more great briefings on topics including employment law, class actions, technology, legal education, compliance, cannabis, law firm management and more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250