The Long Road to Going Public: A Behind-the-Scenes Look at the Lawyering of Dropbox's IPO
It took teamwork, preparation and smart technology use to get Dropbox's IPO over the finish line earlier this year.
July 13, 2018 at 04:33 PM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Mary Anne Becking. Photo credit: Jason Doiy/ALM When cloud storage company Dropbox Inc. went public this past March, its success surprised the market, with shares' prices surging past the company's private market valuation. But that success didn't happen overnight. The journey to San Francisco-based Dropbox's initial public offering was a long one, led by the company's vice president, corporate legal, Mary Anne Becking. She said two years of team building, careful planning, communicating with employees and utilizing new tech went into knocking the company's IPO out of the park. "I think [the planning] had a lot to do with the success ... hiring veteran talent far in advance is something I would really recommend companies do," Becking said. "Not just legal talent, but people on the comms team, the finance team, accounting team. Giving those people time to get to know the business, get to know each other and develop trust." Teamwork Though the IPO team at Dropbox grew over time, it started out very lean, with only five members. At the head was Becking, a seasoned corporate lawyer, with more than a decade of experience in-house, who began planning for the IPO more than a year before the decision to go public was official. In 2017, she enlisted recent Dropbox hire senior corporate counsel, M&A and securities, Cara Angelmar, who brought fresh IPO experience from her time as an associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. A Dropbox junior paralegal, stock admin and project manager rounded out the initial team. Becking said she was skeptical of the nonlegal help at first, but that bringing in a project manager and stock admin was invaluable, providing insight and structure the team would otherwise have lacked. "I think as a lawyer you're a project manager and you're the person who helps solve substantive problems, but we figured we were going to have so much to do between me and Cara that it might be good to bring someone in,” she said. “It worked out really well. Better than we ever would have thought.” Outside counsel from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, who led Apple Inc. and Google's IPOs, joined up in early 2017, said corporate partner Tony Jeffries. He and three other partners, Lisa Stimmell, Rezwan Pavri and Shannon Delahaye (who made partner mid-Dropbox project), were brought on, as well as two or three of the firm's associates. Dropbox's IPO team decided on Wilson Sonsini after a long bake-off process, during which, Becking said, the company was able to gather advice from firm lawyers on next steps. It was a helpful way to hear the perspectives of different outside counsel who had worked on a variety of IPOs. She said Dropbox chose Wilson Sonsini because the firm had experience and was a "jack of all trades" for IPOs, and she wanted a one-stop shop. "We wanted experts who had seen this a million times," Becking said. "That said, we [also] wanted outside counsel we could dig in and spend late nights with, and spend a lot of time with." Wilson Sonsini was a good personality fit, she said, and Becking, Angelmar and Jeffries reminisced about the fun they had texting nonstop and exchanging GIFs in collaborative Dropbox Paper documents as they worked on the IPO. The Dropbox team noted the importance of having a strong relationship between in-house and outside counsel during a process as stressful as going public. "Relationships and rapport matter, both internally and externally," Angelmar said. "Spending time on building relationships with the people you're going to be working with makes working through the thorny issues that much easier." Confidentiality Considerations "We started really small and we wanted to keep it small, because the confidentiality was really important to us,” she said. Confidentiality played a role in Dropbox's IPO timing. Legally speaking, the company was only able to keep its IPO plans under wraps until December 2017, a few months before its March 22, 2018, IPO. That's when Dropbox hit the $1 billion revenue mark, a milestone the company had been creeping towards. Once that threshold was crossed, the company no longer had the “emerging company” status that leaves them eligible for the JOBS Act. Under the JOBS Act, emerging companies are not obligated to disclose IPO plans, an effort to allow smaller companies to test the waters of an IPO without the fear of public backlash if the plans fall through. Keeping plans confidential saves companies from having to disclose competitive information and can reduce the media buzz around initial stages of the process. "We had to do a lot of our 'testing the waters' meetings before Dec. 31, while we still had that status," Becking said. "So we spent a lot of time with outside counsel, figuring out what would happen if we were to go over a billion—would we still be able to test the waters?" Eventually, even the best-kept secret IPOs have to come out of the bag. As the offering drew nearer, Becking's Dropbox team began to grow, getting other departments involved to help ease the transition into life as a public company. The IPO and What Came After Jeffries, who has seen many companies through the IPO process, said Becking and Angelmar's ability to work with the Dropbox communications team was impressive. They were able to deliver confusing information related to the IPO, such as the company's decision to perform a reverse stock split, in a way that helped employees make sense of the changes ahead. Through their work with comms, the IPO team was able to make going public a smooth and comprehensible change for Dropbox employees. Becking and Angelmar credited this inter-team success in part to the use of Dropbox's collaborative document-editing service Paper. When working with comms, or even outside counsel, the team noted the importance of having one document everyone can share, rather than a series of emails with different drafts. "Having now gone through it this way, I can't imagine going through it the old way of emailing Microsoft Word docs back and forth," Angelmar said. The team's use of technology to keep everything in one place helped maintain communication and strengthen bonds within what could have been a large, unwieldy team. Jeffries said that Dropbox's in-house team wasn't just preparing for the communication necessities of the present. He said that, unlike some companies that stay more focused on the IPO than life after, Becking was planning for how Dropbox would handle actually being a public company. That's a strategy that's helpful for long-term success, he said. Post-IPO celebrations, companies and their legal leaders need to be able to get various filings in on time and gather and communicate information that wasn't required in their private days. "The company had already been thinking about what its disclosures would look like [as] a public company a year before it even did its IPO. It was preparing to be public, long before it actually was public," Jeffries said. "And that's a worthwhile distinction, because companies will often think about preparing for the IPO and doing the advanced work for it, but the mindset Dropbox had is, 'We're not just preparing to do the IPO, we're preparing to be a public company,'" he added. It's an adjustment process Becking was able to manage smoothly, with the help of tech, time and a strong team. Dropbox's team was able to plan ahead with financial statements, a financial team in place and strong outside and in-house counsel. But Angelmar noted that no company can plan for every contingency, especially when it comes to such an important transition. "You can't plan for everything at the beginning," Angelmar said. "A lot of it is being flexible and being able to apply past experiences to completely new situations. The challenges are the surprises and the unknowns and being able to address things as they come up."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250