In Wake of Gender Bias Allegations, Women Partners Head for the Doors at Ogletree Deakins
The national labor and employment firm facing a $300 million gender bias suit filed in the Northern District of California has seen a string of female partners leave—including several in California.
July 31, 2018 at 05:39 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart facing a $300 million gender bias suit Jackson Lewis hit the firm with a proposed collective action Knepper joined Buchalter Fisher & Phillips joined the case as named plaintiffs also sought to join the suit Lisa Hamasaki in San Francisco Cécile Martin in Paris Maria Gandarez Sarah Hawk Cheryl Schreck her own shop joining Jackson Lewis last week 
David Sanford of Sanford Heisler Sharp, a veteran litigator in taking on Big Law, represents plaintiffs in the gender bias litigation against Ogletree Deakins. He said his firm has often been retained for gender bias suits against large law firms, including some that have settled. (Chadbourne & Parke, now part of Norton Rose Fulbright, settled earlier this year a gender bias case filed by three former partners represented by Sanford.)
amended complaint filed in May spotlight on Big Law compensation practices Paul Hastings founding in 1977 11 individuals it elevated to partner in January ranking of No. 12 2018 Women's Scorecard top two ranking 2018 Glass Ceiling Report Ogletree Deakins said it was recognized Women in Law Empowerment Forum in its recently published A-List rankings percentage of female equity partners new head of its electronic discovery and records release practice launched an M&A practice UPDATE: 7/31/18, 10:38 p.m. EDT . A statement and other information from Ogletree Deakins has been added to the final six paragraphs of this story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Faegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute read
Anapol Weiss Acquires Boutique Led by Star Litigator Alexandra Walsh
5 minute read
Pierson Ferdinand Lures Veteran M&A Specialist From Sheppard Mullin in Silicon Valley
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-60
- 2California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 3Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 4Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 5Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
