Suit Claims IT Firm Hires, Promotes 'Grossly Disproportionate' Number of South Asians
The suit alleges a "systematic, company-wide, pattern" at HCL Technologies of discrimination in favor of employees of South Asian ancestry.
August 16, 2018 at 06:34 PM
3 minute read
HCL Technologies Ltd., an information technology outsourcing firm based in India with U.S. headquarters in Sunnyvale, California, faces a lawsuit claiming that the company favors South Asians in its hiring and promotion practices.
The class action complaint filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California claims that at least 70 percent of HCL's U.S.-based workforce is South Asian, primarily from India. That percentage, according to the lawsuit, greatly outpaces the number of people of South Asian ancestry in the U.S. population (1 to 2 percent) and the U.S. IT workforce (about 12 percent).
“This grossly disproportionate workforce is the result of HCL's intentional pattern and practice of employment discrimination against individuals who are not South Asian, including discrimination in hiring, promotion, and termination decisions,” wrote plaintiffs attorney Daniel Low of Kotchen & Low in Washington, D.C.
Low, who has pursued similar claims against Indian multinationals Infosys Technologies and Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., said by email Thursday that he learned about HCL's practices while litigating one of the other cases.
The lawsuit was brought on behalf of Reese Voll, a Texas resident who previously worked for HCL on a team tasked with revamping the technology infrastructure for PepsiCo. Voll claims that though he had been promised when hired that he would work on accounts besides Pepsi's, he was instead placed on an unallocated status, or “benched” in the parlance of HCL, after wrapping up his Pepsi work. Per company policy, after 30 days on the bench, he was let go. He claims that he hasn't been hired back to any of the multiple positions for which he's applied.
According to the lawsuit, HCL has a “a systematic, company-wide, pattern” of discriminating in favor of South Asian workers located overseas, securing H-1B and L-1 visas and then prioritizing their use to staff U.S. positions. The suit also claims that HCL seeks out and prefers South Asians tech workers already residing in the United States by relying on a network of South Asian recruiters. The suit also claims that the company promotes South Asians at a disproportionate rate and is more likely to fire non-South Asians.
The suit seeks to certify a class of “all individuals who are not of South Asian race” who applied for HCL jobs in the U.S. and weren't hired, as well as those who were employed by HCL and passed over for promotions or were fired.
A representative for the company did not respond to messages Thursday.
Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Walnut Grower and German Investment Firm Vie for Lead Plaintiff Status in Super Micro Securities Action
Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
3 minute readOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Commentary: Tort Reform Is a Misleading Promise
- 2The Lawyers Waging the Legal Fight Against the Trump Administration
- 3McDermott's Onetime London Leader Headed to Pillsbury
- 4A&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers to EY
- 5Pearl Cohen Enters San Francisco Market Via Combination With IP Boutique
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250