Retired Judge Samuel Conti, Longest-Serving in Northern District History, Dies at 96
Retired U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti, the longest-tenured federal jurist in the history of the Northern District of California, died Wednesday. He was 96.
August 29, 2018 at 07:05 PM
3 minute read
Retired U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti, the longest-tenured federal jurist in the history of the Northern District of California, died Wednesday. He was 96.
A brief email circulated among the judge's former clerks Wednesday informing them that he died peacefully of natural causes Wednesday morning.
In an email Wednesday afternoon, Chief Judge Phyllis Hamilton said she learned of the earlier in the day, but had no further details.
“We will mourn his passing and will be forever grateful for his service,” Hamilton said. “He will always occupy a special place in the heart of the Northern District as our longest serving judge.”
In March 2011, Conti, who was nominated to the bench by President Richard Nixon in 1970, surpassed the tenure of the District's first judge, Ogden Hoffman, who served the San Francisco-based court from 1851 to 1891. Upon his retirement in 2015, he had served 45 years on the bench, including 28 as a senior judge.
Over the course of his career, Conti presided over many high-profile Bay Area cases, including the sentencing of Sara Jane Moore, who attempted to assassinate President Gerald Ford, and a copyright case involving Creedence Clearwater Revival frontman John Fogerty.
In 1979 and 1980, Conti oversaw a grueling nine-month racketeering trial involving members of the Hell's Angels motorcycle club. In a phone interview with The Recorder shortly after he announced his intention to retire, Conti said the case was “very tiring and difficult” since his wife, children and mother were all threatened and required protection from the U.S. Marshals. “If I was smart in those days I would have recused myself, but I was young and energetic,” Conti said.
Conti called being a federal district judge “the best job that anybody can ever have” and said he never had a desire to be appointed to the appellate bench. “All those people do is read papers. We see people and we hear their problems and we try to come up with solutions,” Conti said. “I've considered every case I've had as a learning experience.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
5 minute readCourt rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Freshfields Hires SEC Associate Director in Latest D.C. Lateral Hiring Spree
- 2Jury Finds Dentons, Ex-Partner Beats Malpractice Claim Over $54 Million Currency Deal
- 3Former Cahill Executive Committee Member, Leveraged Finance Pioneer Dies at 67
- 4State Attorney General Faces Federal Courtroom Test Over Crypto Mining Ban
- 5The Corporate Transparency Act: One Year Later With Deadline Looming
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250