Facebook Gets Hit With 2 Class Action Suits Over Controversial Data Practices
Two complaints against the beleaguered tech giant were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California over its collecting user data to build profiles.
August 31, 2018 at 12:56 PM
3 minute read
California is quickly becoming home to a fight over data collection between big tech and consumers, a number of which have found their way into the courts.
Latest among them are two separate class action lawsuits filed against Facebook on Thursday over perceived violations of user privacy. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, both complaints are demanding jury trial, alleging that Facebook's sharing of users' data with third parties, particularly mobile device makers, without user consent. In both instances, violations of privacy were brought under California's Constitutional Right to Privacy.
The first complaint, filed by Tycko & Zavareei partner Sabita Soneji, focuses specifically on the company sharing data with “third-party mobile device makers” such as Apple and Samsung despite using practices—like the creation of a login and password—that lead users to believe they can “lock the door to prevent third parties' access to their information.”
Here's the full complaint by Tycko & Zavareei:
The complaint also accuses Facebook of going to great lengths to push users to believe that their “personal information is kept secure,” including from those with which it's sharing data, which is part of ongoing violations of user rights.
The lead plaintiff in the suit, Oakland resident Velma Serina Rankins, accuses Facebook of sharing her information with “nearly 60 device makers” sans her consent, and claims she suffered damages because of such. The class counts all “persons in the United States” with Facebook accounts utilizing privacy settings and accessing said accounts via mobile devices between Aug. 30, 2015, and April 19, 2018, excluding Facebook “officers, agents and employees.” In addition to violations of California residents' constitutional right to privacy, the complaint marks violation of the Stored Communications Act and trespassing to personal property among its nine charges.
Filed by plaintiffs attorney Joshua Watson of the Arnold Law Firm, the second complaint follows suit, charging Facebook over data sharing with mobile device makers. Attorneys from Morgan & Morgan, Abbott Law Group P.A. and the Hannon Law Firm are representing the class, which the complaint names as “all natural persons residing in the United States who registered for Facebook accounts” and had their data shared with device manufacturers.” California resident Susan Hwang, who “owned and used a Facebook account on her mobile device for over five years” and didn't consent to providing mobile device makers access to her data, is listed as lead plaintiff.
Big tech's data collection practices have come under much judicial heat in recent months. Facebook itself was hit with a multidistrict litigation over its sharing of user data with Cambridge Analytica without user consent. Meanwhile, Google was recently hit with a class action complaint over its data collection practices “against the express wishes and expectations of its users.”
Read the second complaint here:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readMeta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250