Up in Smoke: SEC Warns Investors about Marijuana Investing Risk as Feds Target Greenview Investment Partners
The SEC, highlighting a criminal case brought by federal prosecutors in the Central District of California, warned investors that marijuana businesses "may be criminally prosecuted and this may impact the value of your investment.”
September 05, 2018 at 03:50 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Seizing on the latest enforcement action involving the booming marijuana industry, federal securities regulators sent a broad warning Wednesday about the dangers of investing in an industry that faces an ever-present risk of criminal prosecution under Trump administration policies.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, announcing charges against a Texas-based investment fund and its founder, issued an alert that cited the Trump administration's revocation of Obama-era guidance that largely said enforcers would keep their hands off cannabis companies operating legally under state law.
The withdrawal of the so-called “Cole memo”—named after former Deputy Attorney General James Cole, now a partner at Sidley Austin—sent shock waves through the state-legal cannabis industry. The move, initiated by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, added some new level of regulatory uncertainty just as more states were taking steps to legalize marijuana for medical or recreational use.
“If you are considering investing in a company with operations relating to the marijuana business industry, understand that the company may be criminally prosecuted and this may impact the value of your investment,” the SEC said in the alert. The advisory highlighted a portion of a Sessions memorandum that cited “Congress's determination that marijuana is a dangerous drug and that marijuana activity is a serious crime.”
The new alert came as the SEC and federal prosecutors charged Greenview Investment Partners and its founder, Michael E. Cone, with allegedly defrauding investors through false promises of windfalls from investments in marijuana businesses. According to the SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Cone and the fund raised $3.3 million through a scheme that involved cold calls to retail investors and false claims about having a long record of profitable investing in cannabis-related businesses.
In reality, the SEC alleged, Greenview had no such experience—its sole investment a $400,000 wager on a cannabis company that had yet to harvest a crop. Cone spent investors' money on designer clothes and luxury cars, along with payments to earlier investors meant to prolong his Ponzi-like scheme, the SEC said.
Cone, represented by Bird Marella principal Gary Lincenberg, agreed to be barred from serving as an officer or director at a company, according to the terms of a consent order.
Lincenberg declined to comment Wednesday.
A judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas will determine disgorgement and prejudgment interest “at a later time,” the SEC said.
“Greenview allegedly exploited investor interest in the marijuana industry and lied about high returns and the backgrounds of its key executives,” said Shamoil Shipchandler, director of the SEC's regional office in Fort Worth, Texas. “Investors must remain vigilant and not let the fear of missing out dupe them into making bad investment decisions.”
In a parallel criminal case, brought by the U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, prosecutors charged Cone with fraud and seized about $1.4 million in cash and assets.
The complaint is posted below:
Read more:
➤➤ Get the latest cannabis lawyering, compliance and commentary straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readSouthern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250