UC Hastings Report: New Tools Needed to Address Race, Gender Bias in Legal Profession
A new study from the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California, Hastings College says law firms and in-house legal departments are barely moving the needle when it comes to combating gender and racial discrimination.
September 07, 2018 at 03:38 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Despite the legal industry's efforts to promote racial and gender diversity in the profession, a new report said implicit gender and racial biases are systematically holding women and minorities back—and a new set of tools is needed to combat the problem.
The study, “You Can't Change What You Can't See,” was conducted by the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in partnership with the The American Bar Association's Commission on Women in the Profession and the Minority Corporate Counsel Association (MCCA). The goal? Understand how law firm lawyers and in-house counsel experience gender and racial bias, and why past efforts have failed.
“There was nothing that was surprising,” MCCA president and CEO Jean Lee said of the survey results. “If anything [...] it just confirmed a lot of what we have been hearing and it validates a lot of those experiences of people of color [and] women of color in our profession.”
First launched in April 2016, the survey asked its 2,827 respondents about implicit bias in the workplace, including hiring, assignments, business development, promotions and compensation as well as questions about sexual harassment.
Women of all races and men of color in in-house positions reported lower levels of bias than those in law firms, whereas white men reported lower levels of bias in law firms than they did in-house.
White women and women and men of color all reported that they had to go “above and beyond” in their work to get the same amount of recognition and respect as their colleagues, with 63 percent of women of color responding in the affirmative.
Overall, women of color reported the highest level of bias in almost every workplace scenario, the survey found.
Fifty-eight percent of female attorneys of color and half of white women reported being mistaken for administrative staff or janitors, as compared to only seven percent of white men.
Two-thirds of women of color said they were being held to a higher standard than their colleagues. Some 53 percent of women of color reported having equal access to high-quality assignments as compared to 81 percent of white men.
The survey also found significant bias when it came to parental leave. Woman of all races reported being treated worse after having children by being passed over for promotions, given low-quality work, paid less and being unfairly disadvantaged for working part-time or having a flexible schedule.
About half of people of color, 57 percent of white women and 42 percent of white men agreed that taking parental leave would negatively impact their career.
The study also looked at parity with respect to compensation and found large amounts of bias reported by white women and women of color. Nearly 70 percent of women of color and 60 percent of white women said they were paid less than their colleagues with similar seniority and experience, contrasted with 36 percent of white men who reported the same.
The survey also found that in-house white women reported roughly the same amount of compensation bias as their law firm counterparts.
“I do think that the experience is better in-house overall, but it's modest at best,” Lee said, noting the MCCA's 2017 Annual General Counsel survey that found that minorities only make up 11 percent of general counsel at Fortune 500 companies.
About 25 percent of women reported sexual harassment at work, including unwanted physical contact, sexual comments and/or romantic advances. But more than 70 percent of all groups surveyed said they've encountered sexist comments, stories and jokes.
'Interrupting' Bias
Based on their findings, researchers compiled two “Bias Interrupters Toolkits”—one for in-house departments and the other for law firms—that offer guidance on how to overcome entrenched, implicit bias in hiring, assignments, performance evaluations and compensation.
“We are going to work with our members, firms and companies to help them implement these strategies,” Lee said.
Ultimately, Lee said the survey provides convincing evidence that bias is persisting and offers real solutions. She said legal departments and law firms should see it as a chance “to think a little bit more about the policies that may negatively impact women and people of color in the profession,” and take action.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readFaegre Drinker Adds Three Former Federal Prosecutors From Greenberg Traurig
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250