Contra Costa Judge Accused of Sexual Harassment, Improper Comments
A lawyer for Judge John Laettner said his client denies the charges, and that complaints stem from an ongoing dispute between the judge and the public defender's office over the use of cash bail.
September 19, 2018 at 03:45 PM
4 minute read
A Contra Costa County judge is facing nine disciplinary counts for, among other things, allegedly engaging in a pattern of conduct “that would reasonably be perceived as sexual harassment or sexual discrimination.”
The Commission on Judicial Performance has instituted formal proceedings against Superior Court Judge John Laettner, accusing the 12-year veteran of the Contra Costa bench of willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and improper action. If the charges are sustained, Laettner faces a range of punishment, including possible removal from office.
Four of the nine counts against Laettner stem from comments the judge allegedly made to women in his courtroom about their physical appearance, their tattoos and their ethnicity.
“You often told other female defendants charged with driving under the influence that they were pretty, and that they should not drink and drive or they might get scars,” according to the commission's report. In 2017, Laettner allegedly told a deputy public defender who is part Japanese-American that he “knew some 'very beautiful half-Japanese twins in college,' or words to that effect. [He] also asked her intrusive questions about her racial ancestry, background and upbringing,” the commission alleged.
The remaining five counts deal with allegedly improper judicial actions by Laettner, from failing to recuse himself from cases with ties to his son, a deputy district attorney, to trying to clear a case backlog by offering a 25 percent reduction in sentences and fines to defendants who pleaded guilty.
Read the commission's notice of formal proceedings:
Laettner's attorney, James Murphy of Murphy Pearson Bradley & Feeney, said the judge denies the allegations, some of which date back to events that occurred in 2008. Murphy said the complaints, many of which involve deputy public defenders, stem from an ongoing dispute between the judge and the public defender's office over the use of cash bail.
“I've sent a letter to the public defender saying they need to retain all their records,” Murphy said. “I'm convinced we'll see a concerted effort to discredit Judge Laettner.”
Contra Costa County Public Defender Robin Lipetzky was out of the office Wednesday and could not be reached for comment.
Laettner, a former Tulare County prosecutor, served as an assistant U.S. attorney in California's Northern District between 1989 and 2006. He was then appointed to the Contra Costa bench by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Contra Costa's judicial system has been plagued by high-profile controversies in recent years. Former Contra Costa District Attorney Mark Peterson resigned in 2017 after pleading no contest to a felony perjury charge tied to state findings that he illegally spent $66,000 in campaign money on personal expenses. Peterson was disbarred earlier this year.
In August, the Commission on Judicial Performance censured recently retired Superior Court Judge Bruce Clayton Mills and barred him from holding judicial office again after he was disciplined for misconduct five times in a 17-year period.
Lipetzky's office is under scrutiny for hiring a clerk who had served 15 years for killing a witness in an Oakland murder case. The former clerk and outreach worker, William Edwards Jr., is now facing murder charges connected to a June 1 shooting in North Richmond.
Lipetzky told the East Bay Times her office hired Edwards on the recommendation of an organization that works with former prisoners.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readSouthern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250