L.A. Immigration Judge Calls Jeff Sessions' Rules for Courts 'Unprecedented'
Judge Ashley Tabaddor, the president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, said new rules from U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions compromise the integrity of the nation's immigration courts.
September 21, 2018 at 04:45 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The independence of the immigration courts system is under unprecedented political pressure after U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions moved to implement a tougher regime of quotas and deadlines for the backlogged courts, the head of a judges' union said Friday.
Judge Ashley Tabaddor, the president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, sounded the alarm on Sessions' rules in a press conference Friday. Tabaddor is an immigration judge in Los Angeles, but spoke in her role as the head of the union.
“This is an unprecedented act which compromises the integrity of the court and undermines the decisional independence of our immigration judges, all in the name of addressing the 750,000-backlog of cases which continue to grow with every action of this administration,” she said.
The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Beginning Oct. 1, immigration judges will be required to complete 700 cases a year, under a plan that was unveiled by Sessions in a memo earlier this year. The Justice Department oversees the immigration courts system, which falls under Article 1. Sessions has long complained about the backlog of immigration cases, in part because they allow immigrants who face deportation to remain in the United States while their cases are pending.
But the new regime could endanger judges' jobs and immigrants' due process rights, Tabaddor said. She stressed that Sessions' directive placed excessive pressure on judges.
“Nobody is sitting there in the courtroom, twiddling their thumb,” she said.
The NAIJ president's comments are the latest sign of growing tensions between the group and Main Justice. Last month, the NAIJ filed a formal grievance with the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the DOJ office that oversees the immigration courts, after managers reassigned a Philadelphia immigration judge's cases.
On Friday, Tabaddor insisted that if the Sessions were interested in making immigration courts more efficient, the DOJ could focus on shoring up resources, training and support staff for judges. Tabaddor said she hasn't spoken directly with Sessions, but would welcome the opportunity.
Tabaddor also called on Congress to remove the immigration courts from under the Justice Department's purview, describing the current set-up as a “fundamental flaw.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute read'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250