San Francisco Investment Firm Settles SEC's Fraud Claims for $4.27M
A San Francisco-based investment advisory company, its founder and a former executive will pay a total of $4.27 million to settle federal securities regulators' claims that they improperly diverted investors' funds to the company's parent firm for their own benefit, according to the terms of a settlement announced Friday.
September 28, 2018 at 04:32 PM
4 minute read
A San Francisco-based investment advisory company, its founder and a former executive will pay a total of $4.27 million to settle federal securities regulators' claims that they improperly diverted investors' funds to the company's parent firm for their own benefit, according to the terms of a settlement announced Friday.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the settlement with LendingClub Asset Management, founder Renaud Laplanche and former chief financial officer Carrie Dolan. An order formalizing the settlement, which also contained a list of charges against the respondents, was released at the same time.
LendingClub will pay $4 million; Laplanche, $200,000; and Dolan, $65,000, according to the SEC order.
Additionally, the settlement provides that Laplanche will be suspended from the investment industry for a period of three years, though he can apply for reinstatement once that period is over.
LendingClub, Laplanche and Dolan were charged with fraud for diverting funds from LendingClub to LendingClub Corp., where Laplanche was also the founder and chief executive officer.
The SEC alleged that LendingClub Asset Management (formerly known as LendingClub Advisors), Laplanche, and Dolan each violated the anti-fraud provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
The SEC noted that LendingClub Corp.'s board of directors, which learned of the transfers after an internal investigation, self-reported to the SEC in May 2016.
The company “promptly self-reported its executives' misconduct and provided extraordinary cooperation,” the SEC said in a statement.
The SEC's order requires LendingClub to “prominently” post a copy of the order on its corporate website and to notify all potentially affected investors of the action either by email or regular mail.
According to the order: LendingClub Advisors, as it was known, provided investment advisory services to several other private funds that purchased loan interests offered by LendingClub Corp., a publicly-traded online marketplace lending company.
LendingClub Advisors and Laplanche were charged with causing one of the private funds it managed to purchase interests in loans that were at risk of going unfunded—and to benefit LendingClub, not the fund client, in breach of LCA's fiduciary duty, the order said.
The SEC also found that LCA, Laplanche, and Dolan improperly adjusted monthly returns for this fund and other LCA-managed funds to improve the returns they reported to fund investors.
“Investment advisers have an obligation to put their clients' interests ahead of their own,” said Daniel Michael, chief of the SEC's Complex Financial Instruments Unit, in the statement. “By using funds managed by LCA to benefit its parent company, LCA and LaPlanche failed to do so.”
“Investors depend on fund advisers to give them the straight scoop on performance so they can make informed investment decisions,” Jina Choi, the director of the SEC's San Francisco regional office, added in the statement. “Advisers who adjust their valuation processes to boost results are in breach of their duties to investors.”
Scott Edelman and Adam Fee of the New York office of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy represented Laplanche. They released a statement from Laplanche: “I am pleased to have worked out a settlement with the SEC to put to rest any issues related to compliance lapses that might have occurred under my watch at Lending Club. Consistent with SEC policy, I have agreed not to admit nor deny the specific narrative of the events contained in the settlement order.”
LendingClub retained John Potter of the San Francisco office of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. He didn't return a call seeking comment on the settlement.
Neither did Susan Resley, of the San Francisco office of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, who represented Dolan.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWithers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
Legal Tech Startups That Google-backed Venture Firms Invested in Throughout 2024
As AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Supreme Court allows investors' class action to proceed against microchip company Nvidia
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 2Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 3Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 4Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 5Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250