Facebook's Big Breach Spawns Ireland Probe, Early Test of GDPR
The Irish Data Protection Commission announced its investigation into the Facebook breach via Twitter on Wednesday—the first such probe since the General Data Protection Regulation went into effect in May.
October 03, 2018 at 07:07 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The Irish Data Protection Commission announced Wednesday that it had launched an investigation into Facebook, likely the first such inquiry of a major tech company since the implementation of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation back in May.
The IDPC's investigation, which was announced via tweet, was spurred by Facebook's announcement Sept. 28 that a data breach on the platform impacted approximately 50 million users, less than 10 percent of whom are reported to be EU residents. The IDPC is responsible for upholding EU data privacy laws in Ireland, where Facebook's European headquarters are located.
“In particular, the investigation will examine Facebook's compliance with its obligation under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the security and safeguarding of the personal data it processes,” the IDPC tweeted.
Menlo Park, California-based Facebook is the first major U.S. tech company to report a large data breach since the GDPR's implementation date, and the Irish commission's handling of the hack could set the standard for future investigations.
The handling of breaches could change under the GDPR regime, which sets hefty fines for companies that don't strongly protect user data. Fines can result from not informing impacted users of an incursion within 72 hours. Facebook informed users of the breach Sept. 28 and said in a blog post that the problem was discovered Sept. 25.
The company could be hit with a fine if the EU determines Facebook did not take the necessary steps to prevent a data breach or broke other GDPR regulations. The highest fine a company can face under GDPR is 4 percent of its annual turnover—about $1.63 billion for Facebook.
Facebook's post-breach blog post from vice president of product management Guy Rosen outlined the company's steps to address the hack. He said that hackers used the platform's “view as” security feature to steal Facebook access tokens and subsequently take over user accounts.
Facebook said Sept. 28 that law enforcement had already been contacted, the vulnerability in its code had been fixed and nearly 90 million accounts' access tokens were reset to boost security. The “view as” feature was also disabled.
Rosen wrote Facebook had launched its own investigation. According to a statement Wednesday, the tech company has also been working with the IDPC.
“We have been in close contact with the IDPC since we have become aware of the security attack and will continue to cooperate with their investigation,” a Facebook spokesperson said.
The data breach is just one of Facebook's many recent troubles. Last week, the social network was sued by its former content moderators for allegedly traumatizing them with disturbing images, videos and other posts on its platform.
Facebook has also faced scrutiny over the Cambridge Analytica data breach, which was revealed in March 2018. Political data firm Cambridge Analytica harvested data from millions of Facebook accounts and allegedly used the information to influence elections, including the U.S. 2016 presidential race.
In July, U.K. Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham said she intended to fine Facebook £500,000 ($647,517.50) for the Cambridge Analytica breach because, as she told Politico and other outlets, the company “failed to provide the protections required under data protection laws.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Judge Approves Shaq's $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
3 minute readCrypto Exchange’s ‘Meteoric Rise’ Leads to Nationwide Class Action Trend
4 minute readSEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250