In the Wake of Facebook Breach Suit, Familiar Plaintiffs Tandem Takes Aim at Google+
For the second time in less than a month, lawyers at Morgan & Morgan and Arnold Law Firm have taken aim at an internet giant with breach claims.
October 09, 2018 at 01:27 PM
3 minute read
In the wake of news reports about previously undisclosed security vulnerabilities at the flagging social network Google+, Alphabet Inc. and Google Inc. were hit Monday with a lawsuit claiming that Google+ allowed third-party application developers access to users' private profile data between 2015 and March 2018.
“While this information was supposed to be protected, and shared only with expressed permissions and limitations, defendants allowed third-party application developers to improperly collect the personal information of up to 500,000 Google+ users,” wrote lawyers representing two plaintiffs, Google+ account holders from California and Florida.
On Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Mountain View, California-based company exposed data—full names, photos, contact information and occupation—of thousands of users of Google+. Google said it chose not to disclose the breach when it was discovered in March because the company found no evidence of data misuse. Alphabet announced Monday it plans to permanently shut down the consumer functionality of Google+.
The lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of California by lawyers at Morgan & Morgan and Arnold Law Firm. This is the second time in less than a month that same law firm tandem has taken aim at an internet giant with breach claims in Northern California courts. The firms sued Facebook Inc. in the same venue shortly after the social networking giant announced late last month that it had discovered a security breach affecting almost 50 million accounts.
“Given that Google+ was launched to challenge Facebook, the recent data security incidents suffered by Facebook users should have made defendants more sensitive to the necessary protection of Google+ users' data,” the lawyers wrote in Monday's complaint. “Instead, defendants allowed this vulnerability in its system to endure for nearly three years, all the while leaking private information to unauthorized third parties.”
Morgan & Morgan's John Yanchunis, who is based in Tampa, Florida, was traveling Tuesday and unavailable for comment. Yanchunis is also lead counsel in separate multidistrict litigation targeting Yahoo Inc. with claims stemming from a string of data breaches affecting billions of accounts. Yanchunis and defense counsel in the Yahoo case announced in court papers last month that they had reached an ”agreement in principle” to settlement terms in that case.
Read the Google+ complaint:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250