No Spring Enrollment for Embattled Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Amid an effort to retain its American Bar Association accreditation, Thomas Jefferson School of Law has opted not to enroll new students for the spring 2019 semester, a move its dean says will bring it in line with many other schools that only accept students in the fall.
October 17, 2018 at 03:29 PM
3 minute read
The hits keep coming for the Thomas Jefferson School of Law.
The struggling San Diego law school will not accept any new students for the spring 2019 semester, amid a fight to hold on to its accreditation from the American Bar Association. The ABA placed Thomas Jefferson on probation in November for being out of compliance with a number of its accreditation standards pertaining to admissions and educational program. The ABA also raised concerns about the school's finances.
Above the Law first reported that Thomas Jefferson has canceled enrollment for the upcoming semester.
The school announced in May that it was vacating its $90 million, 7-year-old campus for rented space in a downtown office building, a move that saves Thomas Jefferson a significant amount of money. But the new space has remained under construction during the fall semester, leaving students unhappy, according to anonymous sources quoted by Above the Law. Keller refuted that claim, saying that construction on the classrooms is complete though some work is ongoing elsewhere.
In an email to The Recorder Wednesday, Thomas Jefferson interim dean Linda Keller said that “the Law School is committed to providing the best environment for our students.” She added, “We've decided to [forgo] the revenue that a spring entering class would provide because a proportionally smaller spring entering class might not provide the vibrant, collaborative atmosphere for our new students that is an essential part of the first-year law student experience.”
Keller said the move brings Thomas Jefferson in line with many other law schools, which only admit new students in the fall semester.
Meanwhile, Thomas Jefferson is planning for the possibility that the ABA strips its accreditation, which would prevent its graduates from sitting for the bar exam. The ABA revoked the accreditation of another for-profit law campus—Arizona Summit Law School—in June, in an apparent first. (Arizona Summit has sued in a bid to restore its accreditation but administrators have said it will close once the ABA has approved its teach-out plan.)
Thomas Jefferson has applied to become a California-accredited law school, which would enable graduates to sit for the bar there even if it loses ABA accreditation. The State Bar of California's Committee of Bar Examines is slated to consider the school's application on Friday. Thomas Jefferson has asked the committee to fast-track its application, given its current status as an ABA-accredited school.
“[Thomas Jefferson] disagrees with some of the ABA's findings, but it is actively taking steps to address all requests from the ABA, and hopes to maintain ABA accreditation and approval,” according to a California Bar staff memo. “[Thomas Jefferson] also wishes to be cautious and to ensure that, if the ABA accreditation should lapse, the school would continue to maintain an accreditation that would allow its students to be eligible to take the California Bar Examination.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
Trending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250