No Spring Enrollment for Embattled Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Amid an effort to retain its American Bar Association accreditation, Thomas Jefferson School of Law has opted not to enroll new students for the spring 2019 semester, a move its dean says will bring it in line with many other schools that only accept students in the fall.
October 17, 2018 at 03:29 PM
3 minute read
|
The hits keep coming for the Thomas Jefferson School of Law.
The struggling San Diego law school will not accept any new students for the spring 2019 semester, amid a fight to hold on to its accreditation from the American Bar Association. The ABA placed Thomas Jefferson on probation in November for being out of compliance with a number of its accreditation standards pertaining to admissions and educational program. The ABA also raised concerns about the school's finances.
Above the Law first reported that Thomas Jefferson has canceled enrollment for the upcoming semester.
The school announced in May that it was vacating its $90 million, 7-year-old campus for rented space in a downtown office building, a move that saves Thomas Jefferson a significant amount of money. But the new space has remained under construction during the fall semester, leaving students unhappy, according to anonymous sources quoted by Above the Law. Keller refuted that claim, saying that construction on the classrooms is complete though some work is ongoing elsewhere.
In an email to The Recorder Wednesday, Thomas Jefferson interim dean Linda Keller said that “the Law School is committed to providing the best environment for our students.” She added, “We've decided to [forgo] the revenue that a spring entering class would provide because a proportionally smaller spring entering class might not provide the vibrant, collaborative atmosphere for our new students that is an essential part of the first-year law student experience.”
Keller said the move brings Thomas Jefferson in line with many other law schools, which only admit new students in the fall semester.
Meanwhile, Thomas Jefferson is planning for the possibility that the ABA strips its accreditation, which would prevent its graduates from sitting for the bar exam. The ABA revoked the accreditation of another for-profit law campus—Arizona Summit Law School—in June, in an apparent first. (Arizona Summit has sued in a bid to restore its accreditation but administrators have said it will close once the ABA has approved its teach-out plan.)
Thomas Jefferson has applied to become a California-accredited law school, which would enable graduates to sit for the bar there even if it loses ABA accreditation. The State Bar of California's Committee of Bar Examines is slated to consider the school's application on Friday. Thomas Jefferson has asked the committee to fast-track its application, given its current status as an ABA-accredited school.
“[Thomas Jefferson] disagrees with some of the ABA's findings, but it is actively taking steps to address all requests from the ABA, and hopes to maintain ABA accreditation and approval,” according to a California Bar staff memo. “[Thomas Jefferson] also wishes to be cautious and to ensure that, if the ABA accreditation should lapse, the school would continue to maintain an accreditation that would allow its students to be eligible to take the California Bar Examination.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
Trending Stories
- 1Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 2Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
- 3What Are Forbidden Sexual Relations With Clients?
- 4AEDI Takeaways: Demystifying Hype, Changing Caselaw & Harvey’s CEO Talks State of Industry
- 5New England Law | Boston Announces New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250