SEC Charges Bay Area Immigration Lawyer, Firm With Securities Fraud in Alleged EB-5 Scheme
The SEC alleges that Jean D. Chen, the sole partner in an immigration firm based in San Jose and San Francisco, secured over $10 million in undisclosed commissions by selling EB-5 securities to her legal clients and funneled their money to investments properties she and her husband secretly controlled.
October 18, 2018 at 06:49 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has charged a Bay Area immigration lawyer and her law firm with securities fraud claiming that they funneled clients' investments into properties that netted the lawyer and her husband more than $12 million in undisclosed commissions.
In a complaint filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the SEC claims that Jean D. Chen, the sole partner in immigration firm Law Offices of Jean D. Chen based in San Jose and San Francisco, secured commissions by directing her clients to purchase certain offerings under the federal EB-5 immigrant investor program. The program gives preferential immigration treatment to foreign investors who put their money into certain job-creating projects in the U.S.
The SEC complaint claims that Chen and her husband Tony Ye, who served as the law firm's office manager, funneled tens of millions of dollars in client money to investment properties they secretly controlled. The agency also contends Chen and Ye disguised their role in Golden State Regional Center LLC, an EB-5 regional center the SEC alleges the couple owns and controls.
Also named in Thursday's complaint were Kuansheng Chen, a Hong Kong-based friend of the couple who is alleged to have acted as a figurehead to a Chinese immigration agency they controlled, and Kai Hao Robinson, an accountant whom the SEC alleges posed as the manager of Golden State Regional Center.
“When defendants became aware of the SEC's investigation, they engaged in a cover-up operation, which included, among other things, refusing to produce documents, manufacturing exculpatory evidence, and scrubbing additional records in an attempt to obfuscate their involvement in the schemes,” wrote the SEC lawyers in Thursday's complaint. “The conflict of interest created by Chen, Ye, and the Law Offices' management and control of Golden State and its Bay Area projects would have been material to a reasonable investor's investment decision.”
In a press release announcing Thursday's lawsuit, Melissa Hodgman, associate director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, said that “Chen's alleged self-dealing breached her clients' trust and violated the federal securities laws.”
“Where conduct harms investors in our markets, attempts to stymie our investigation by fabricating evidence and withholding documents will not deter our efforts,” she said.
Lawyers for the defendants either declined to comment or didn't respond on Thursday.
Thursday's complaint claims that after Chen and Ye became aware of the SEC investigation in 2016, they attempted to scrub all mentions of the firm's Beijing office, which shared an address of a Chinese immigration agency linked to the undisclosed commission payments. The SEC claims that even though Chen testified under oath during the investigation that the firm never had a Beijing office and she never told anyone that it did, a Beijing location was listed on the Law Offices' website, brochures, retainer agreements and business cards in materials previously provided to investors.
The receptionist at the San Jose office of Chen's law firm said she was out of the office at a meeting Thursday afternoon. She didn't immediately respond to an email message seeking comment.
Chen and her firm are represented by Thomas Carlucci of Foley & Lardner, and Ye, Chen's husband, is represented by Martha Boersch of Boersch Shapiro. Robinson and the Golden State Regional Center are represented by Bruce Kelson of Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis. Kuansheng Chen, meanwhile, is represented by Karl Kronenberger of Kronenberger Rosenfeld.
Read the SEC's complaint:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute read'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250