Tech Dealmakers Less Bullish on Tech M&A Than They Were Six Months Ago
But the market is still strong, and the tech industry may be on track to reach record deal values in 2018, according to a report.
October 24, 2018 at 06:39 PM
3 minute read
Technology industry dealmakers are less optimistic about M&A work than they were back in April, according to a new Morrison & Foerster survey.
In the semi-annual Tech M&A Leaders' Survey, made public this week, only 43 percent of respondents said they expect to see more activity over the next year—a drop from the 66 percent who six months ago said they expected to see an increase.
The report found that 41 percent of survey respondents expect tech M&A to stabilize in the near future, and 16 percent expect to see a decline.
The “less bullish outlook” isn't surprising, according to the report, because the market is closing in on a new record.
“The market is still very strong, especially when you take into account that the tech industry is on track to finish near, if not over, the highest deal value we've seen since the dotcom crash,” said Eric McCrath, co-chair of Morrison & Foerster's corporate department, in a statement accompanying the report.
The value of tech companies that changed hands through the first quarter of the year was $425 billion, according to 451 Research, a company that provides IT industry research and analysis. At that rate, the total value of deals in 2018 could exceed the previous record, reached in 2015, of $575 billion.
The volume of tech M&A activity in recent years has set a high bar, which explains in part why dealmakers expect a change in the deal cycle, McCrath said.
The M&A Leaders' Survey, conducted by Morrison & Foerster and 451 Research, includes responses from 151 individuals—40 percent investment bankers and 38 percent C-level or M&A executives. Others are lawyers, venture capitalists, private equity professionals and others doing M&A work. About 85 of the respondents are from the United States, including 39 percent from the Silicon Valley.
More than half (54 percent) of survey respondents said they expect scrutiny from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), as well as trade disputes, to put a damper on tech M&A over the next year. But just 34 percent expect antitrust issues to negatively impact M&A activity—presumably because the Trump administration, which did not block AT&T's acquisition of Time Warner, is seen as less focused on antitrust matters.
The results of the survey were almost split in the view of M&A valuations, with 32 percent of respondents expecting a decrease in private company M&A valuations over the next year, while 30 percent forecast an increase.
A total of 79 percent of the respondents expect to see an increase in sales of private equity portfolio companies to strategic acquirers—a trend Morrison & Foerster said is bearing out, with 15 such purchases so far this year compared to 2017.
The survey suggests that buyers have a continued interest in companies in the machine-learning business, with 62 percent of respondents saying machine learning has been a bigger driver of M&A this year than in the past. On the flip side, 19 percent of the respondents found that cryptocurrency was the most “over-hyped technology” over the last 20 years.
The respondents note that in addition to M&A, tech companies benefit from a strong initial public offering market, and they predicted that 20 tech companies will go public over the next year.
Further Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250