With Google Accused of Protecting Men in Power, Company's Policies in the Spotlight
In the wake of a report from The New York Times, Google's chief executive officer Sundar Pichai sent an email to employees Thursday addressing the company's handling of sexual misconduct and inappropriate relationships.
October 25, 2018 at 10:45 PM
4 minute read
Google's chief executive officer Sundar Pichai sent an email to employees Thursday addressing the Mountain View, California-based company's handling of sexual misconduct and inappropriate relationships.
Pichai's email followed a report from The New York Times that alleged high-ranking men, including parent company Alphabet's CLO David Drummond, at the company faced little or no consequences for inappropriate sexual relationships with women in their departments, some of which were consensual.
The allegations indicate how power dynamics play out in the workplace
“Today's story in the New York Times was difficult to read,” Pichai said in the email. “We are dead serious about making sure we provide a safe and inclusive workplace. We want to assure you that we review every single complaint about sexual harassment or inappropriate conduct, we investigate and we take action.”
The CEO said that Google has made a number of changes in recent years to prevent sexual misconduct and encourage reporting, including a stricter stance on inappropriate conduct from those in a position of power. According to Pichai, 48 employees have been fired without an exit package for sexual harassment in the past two years, including 13 in senior manager positions or above.
He said the tech company has also updated its policy, now requiring vice presidents and senior vice presidents to disclose relationships with colleagues, regardless of whether or not the co-worker reports to them.
Deborah Rhode, the Ernest W. McFarland Professor of Law, the director of the Center on the Legal Profession, and the director of the Program in Law and Social Entrepreneurship at Stanford University, said that companies should avoid hard laws against workplace dating.
“If organizations take a really draconian position on this, they force the relationship under ground, and that isn't necessarily better,” Rhode said.
Drummond, who The New York Times reported had an affair with legal department colleague Jennifer Blakely during his time as GC of Google, did not report the relationship until the pair had a child in 2007. According to Thursday's report, Drummond and Blakely began dating in 2004.
Rhode said that companies should be informed of a relationship between manager and subordinates as soon as possible.
“I think you want full disclosure at the earliest possible moment and a transfer of the individual to a situation in which she is not in a reporting relationship,” Rhode said.
After Drummond informed Google of the relationship, Blakely was transferred to the sales department. She left the company a year later, with Google asking her to sign forms saying her departure was voluntary, according to The New York Times.
But Rhode said that someone signing a form isn't a sure indicator that a departure was voluntary.
Kathleen Clark, a professor of law at Washington University who teaches courses on legal ethics, said that it's also difficult to draw the line between consensual and nonconsensual relationships when office power dynamics are involved.
“To call it consensual when one of the parties is in a supervisor position over another misses the point,” Clark said. “It's a fraught situation. When it ends, if it ends, it probably will not end well for both parties as we see here. The party for whom it ended well was the party with the greater power from the beginning.”
She said that it's important for companies to have clear, consistent policies around workplace dating, so that everyone in the company knows what is and isn't allowed and the consequences of engaging in a relationship.
Employees should be aware of the policies in place and have training around sexual harassment and misconduct, she said. Clark added that, when it comes to supervisor subordinate relationships, companies may consider an outright ban because of the power dynamics in play.
“It's a bit of a dilemma how to address the situation. One can imagine addressing it by removing the subordinate, moving the subordinate to a different position but also taking some kind of disciplinary action against the supervisor,” Clark said.
She said employees should also know to whom they can report cases of harassment or misconduct.
On Thursday, Pichai said that Google created a report on internal investigations in 2015 to provide transparency about investigations into misconduct at the company.
”We are committed to ensuring that Google is a workplace where you can feel safe to do your best work and where there are serious consequences for anyone who behaves inappropriately,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCollectible Maker Funko Wins Motion to Dismiss Securities Class Action
How Tony West Used Transparency to Reform Uber's Toxic Culture
What Paul Grewal Has Learned About Advocacy as Coinbase's Top Lawyer
7 minute readShowered With Stock, Tech GCs Incentivized to 'Knock It Out of the Park'
Trending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madicon, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250