Cincinnati Zoo Sues for Return of Koko's Companion
The Cincinnati Zoo loaned the male gorilla Ndume to The Gorilla Foundation in 1991 in hopes of breeding him with Koko, the Western Lowland Gorilla famous for learning sign language. Since Koko died in June, the zoo claims the Redwood City-based animal sanctuary has reneged on an agreement to return Ndume.
October 26, 2018 at 03:13 PM
3 minute read
The Cincinnati Zoo has sued the psychologist who famously taught the Western Lowland Gorilla Koko sign language and the nonprofit she founded, seeking the return of a male gorilla it loaned in hopes that he would mate with Koko.
Psychologist Francine “Penny” Patterson's nonprofit, The Gorilla Foundation, received the male gorilla Ndume on loan under a 1991 agreement that was revised in 2015. Although the attempts to pair Koko and Ndube didn't pan out, they lived within sight and smell of each other until Koko's death in June of this year.
The Cincinnati Zoo claims since Koko's death, the Redwood City-based animal sanctuary has reneged on the agreement to return Ndume to a facility approved by an organization charged with overseeing the well-being of gorillas in zoos in North America.
“TGF has breached the loan agreement and is keeping Ndume in violation of the law and to the detriment of Ndume's health,” wrote the zoo's lawyers, Simon Frankel of Covington & Burling in San Francisco and Aaron Herzig of Taft Stettinius & Hollister in Cincinnati.
“Western lowland gorillas require social interaction with other gorillas in order to be healthy,” they continued in the complaint, filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. “TGF does not possess any gorillas besides Ndume, and does not have a reasonable prospect to imminently—and legally—obtain possession of another gorilla. Accordingly, if Ndume is not immediately transferred from TGF to [Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden], he will continue to live in isolation from other gorillas, and thus, in a sub-optimal, at-risk situation.”
The suit seeks to force The Gorilla Foundation to be bound by the terms of the agreement to force the organization and its staff and veterinarians to coordinate a timely transfer of Ndube to the zoo, the facility chosen by the consortium of scientists.
Representatives from The Gorilla Foundation didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
According to correspondence between the zoo and TGF attached as exhibits to Thursday's complaint, the sanctuary was initially cooperating with plans to relocated Ndume, but changed course in September claimed in a letter that a move to the zoo would provide “serious life and safety risks” given the gorilla's 37-year-old age and the fact that he's spent the past 27 years in TGF's sanctuary environment.
But the zoo's lawyers point out that TGF had already notified its donors and social media followers that it intended to find other female gorillas to live with Ndume at the sanctuary—a “direct contravention” of the parties' agreement and scientists' recommendation, according to the complaint.
“There is no scientific basis for TGF's claim that Ndume is at any increased risk,” the zoo's lawyers wrote. “And TGF offers no explanation for why it agreed to the transfer in the agreement if it believed such a transfer was harmful.”
Read the complaint below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Exchange’s ‘Meteoric Rise’ Leads to Nationwide Class Action Trend
4 minute readPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250