Cincinnati Zoo Sues for Return of Koko's Companion
The Cincinnati Zoo loaned the male gorilla Ndume to The Gorilla Foundation in 1991 in hopes of breeding him with Koko, the Western Lowland Gorilla famous for learning sign language. Since Koko died in June, the zoo claims the Redwood City-based animal sanctuary has reneged on an agreement to return Ndume.
October 26, 2018 at 03:13 PM
3 minute read
The Cincinnati Zoo has sued the psychologist who famously taught the Western Lowland Gorilla Koko sign language and the nonprofit she founded, seeking the return of a male gorilla it loaned in hopes that he would mate with Koko.
Psychologist Francine “Penny” Patterson's nonprofit, The Gorilla Foundation, received the male gorilla Ndume on loan under a 1991 agreement that was revised in 2015. Although the attempts to pair Koko and Ndube didn't pan out, they lived within sight and smell of each other until Koko's death in June of this year.
The Cincinnati Zoo claims since Koko's death, the Redwood City-based animal sanctuary has reneged on the agreement to return Ndume to a facility approved by an organization charged with overseeing the well-being of gorillas in zoos in North America.
“TGF has breached the loan agreement and is keeping Ndume in violation of the law and to the detriment of Ndume's health,” wrote the zoo's lawyers, Simon Frankel of Covington & Burling in San Francisco and Aaron Herzig of Taft Stettinius & Hollister in Cincinnati.
“Western lowland gorillas require social interaction with other gorillas in order to be healthy,” they continued in the complaint, filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. “TGF does not possess any gorillas besides Ndume, and does not have a reasonable prospect to imminently—and legally—obtain possession of another gorilla. Accordingly, if Ndume is not immediately transferred from TGF to [Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden], he will continue to live in isolation from other gorillas, and thus, in a sub-optimal, at-risk situation.”
The suit seeks to force The Gorilla Foundation to be bound by the terms of the agreement to force the organization and its staff and veterinarians to coordinate a timely transfer of Ndube to the zoo, the facility chosen by the consortium of scientists.
Representatives from The Gorilla Foundation didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
According to correspondence between the zoo and TGF attached as exhibits to Thursday's complaint, the sanctuary was initially cooperating with plans to relocated Ndume, but changed course in September claimed in a letter that a move to the zoo would provide “serious life and safety risks” given the gorilla's 37-year-old age and the fact that he's spent the past 27 years in TGF's sanctuary environment.
But the zoo's lawyers point out that TGF had already notified its donors and social media followers that it intended to find other female gorillas to live with Ndume at the sanctuary—a “direct contravention” of the parties' agreement and scientists' recommendation, according to the complaint.
“There is no scientific basis for TGF's claim that Ndume is at any increased risk,” the zoo's lawyers wrote. “And TGF offers no explanation for why it agreed to the transfer in the agreement if it believed such a transfer was harmful.”
Read the complaint below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
Judge to Hear Arguments on Whether Google's Advertising Tech Constitutes a Monopoly
3 minute readSEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250