Genentech Takes Aim at Rival as Feds Charge Former Employees With Trade Secret Theft
Three former Genentech employees have been indicted for funneling trade secrets to biosimilar rival JHL Biotech. In a civil suit, Genentech is suing the employees, JHL, and its founders, who are both former Genentech employees themselves.
October 30, 2018 at 04:50 PM
4 minute read
Three former Genentech workers and another individual have been hit with the trade secret equivalent of a double whammy.
In a federal indictment unsealed Monday, Xanthe Lam, a principal scientist who was with Genentech from 1985 until last year, her husband Allen Lam, and James Quach, who both also logged time at Genentech, were charged with stealing trade secrets to help the company's Taiwan-based rival JHL Biosciences make biosimilar versions of Genentech drugs, alongside John Chan.
Also on Monday, Genentech, represented by Keker, Van Nest & Peters, took aim at the former employees, JHL, and its co-founders Racho Jordanov and Rose Lin, who are both former Genentech employees, with a civil trade secret theft lawsuit.
“Dishonest and illegal actions such as these threaten scientific innovation, obstruct fair competition, and undermine the hard work of our employees and people throughout the industry who act with integrity and in the best interests of patients every day,” said Genentech spokeswoman Nadine Pinell in an emailed statement Tuesday. Pinell also noted that the company reported findings of an internal investigation to the local U.S. Attorney's Office and is cooperating in the office's ongoing criminal investigation.
“We will continue to pursue all necessary legal actions to halt any further dissemination and illegal use of our misappropriated intellectual property,” she added.
Michael Stepanian, who represents Allen Lam, responded to requests for comment to himself and William Osterhoudt, who represents Xanthe Lam.
“They would do nothing at all to harm Genentech and did not profit in any way from these allegations,” Stepanian said.
Lawyers for the other charged individuals and a representative of JHL didn't immediately respond to messages Tuesday.
According to the federal indictment, the Lams communicated with JHL employees, many of whom were former Genentech employees. The defendants, the government claims, sought to help speed JHL's development of biosimilars, the generic versions of Genentech biologic treatments developed using living cells rather than the chemicals associated with traditional pharmaceuticals.
The indictment claims that beginning in December 2013, Xanthe Lam spent four weeks at JHL facilities in Taiwan without informing or getting approval from the appropriate manager at Genentech. The government claims that Xanthe Lam had her Genentech-issued laptop with her during her visit, allowing her to access Genentech's password-protected document repository.
The indictment also claims that Xanthe Lam helped John Chan, the son of a family friend, get jobs at JHL. Xanthe Lam also allegedly funneled confidential documents to Chan via her husband with explicit instructions of “don't show it to others.”
The government has also charged Xanthe Lam with conspiring with James Quach in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. In particular, the government claims she allowed Quach to gain access to Genentech's secure document repository to steal proprietary manufacturing protocols.
Genentech's civil suit claims that JHL co-founders Racho Jordanov and Rose Lin reached out to Xanthe Lam directly via her personal email to work as a consultant for the company while she was still employed by Genentech. The company's lawyers claim that JHL's co-founders “acted with oppression and malice, knowingly misappropriating Genentech's confidential, proprietary, and trade secret information with the assistance of Xanthe and Allen Lam for his own benefit and the benefit of JHL.”
Read the criminal indictment:
Read the civil complaint:
Correction: An earlier version of the story mistakenly said that Chan previously worked at Genentech. We regret the error.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency Practices Stand to Gain From Trump Election
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-59
- 2The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 3Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 4Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 5Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250