SF Prosecutor Faces 90-Day Suspension From Bar Court for Misconduct on Murder Case
A California Bar Court Judge found that Assistant District Attorney Andrew Ganz was culpable for four counts of misconduct for withholding evidence and making misleading statements while prosecuting a murder case in his previous post as a prosecutor for Solano County
October 31, 2018 at 07:02 PM
3 minute read
Andrew Ganz, an assistant district attorney in San Francisco, is facing a 90-day suspension from practicing law and two years of probation after a state bar court judge found him culpable of four counts of misconduct.
In a 48-page decision issued on Oct. 29, California Bar Court Judge Pat McElroy found that Ganz withheld evidence and made misleading statements while prosecuting a murder case in his previous post as a prosecutor in Solano County.
McElroy found that Ganz failed to disclose detailed discussions investigators and prosecutors had with a forensic pathologist whose findings contradicted a key prosecution theory in the case. McElroy found that Ganz's failures “suggest a prosecutorial attitude either incapable of or disinterested in maintaining the minimum ethical standards that all prosecutors are sworn to uphold.”
A spokesman for the San Francisco District Attorney's Office declined to comment, citing office policy regarding personnel matters. Ganz referred a request for comment to his attorney, Alfred Giannini, who said he and his client are still reviewing the decision and considering next steps.
“The most important thing to us is the finding that there was no deliberate misconduct on behalf of my client, because if that were the case that would be a very different matter,” Giannini said.
Ganz's bar court proceedings stems from his 2012 assignment to work on the prosecution of Michael Daniels for the murder of Jessica Brastow, the first homicide case Ganz had handled. Despite a lead investigator's theory that Daniels had choked Brastow to death with a sock, which was recovered from the hotel room where her body was found, the lead forensic pathologist found the choking-by-sock theory implausible. She stated during her dictation following her examination that the detective “wants this to be a homicide, and there is no way I could call this at this point and I'm not going to be pushed into it, so, he can go kiss my ass.”
Daniels was ultimately found not guilty on all charges in the murder case in April 2014.
Among other findings, the Bar Court held that Ganz failed to inform Daniels' defense attorney about a meeting where the pathologist discussed her misgivings about the prosecution theory.
A copy of the order is available below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
5 minute read$15K Family Vacation Turned 'Colossal Nightmare': Lawsuit Filed Against Vail Ski Resorts
Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Del. Courts to Address in 2025
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 2On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
- 3State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
- 4$5 Million Settlement Reached With Stone Academy
- 5$15K Family Vacation Turned 'Colossal Nightmare': Lawsuit Filed Against Vail Ski Resorts
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250