Governor Brown's Still Mum on 14-Month Supreme Court Vacancy
"I find I never regret an appointment I didn't make," Brown said Wednesday.
November 07, 2018 at 03:40 PM
3 minute read
Governor Jerry Brown. Credit: Jason Doiy/ The Recorder
Gov. Jerry Brown on Wednesday refused to say when he intends to fill a state Supreme Court vacancy or why he's taken so long to name a replacement for Associate Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar.
Meeting with reporters in a post-election press conference in Sacramento, Brown said he's “taking his time” finding the right candidate for the high court, a phrase he's used repeatedly when asked about the post that has been empty since Sept. 1, 2017.
“I find I never regret an appointment I didn't make,” Brown said.
Asked if he was waiting for a potential appointment to finish a job or a term in office, Brown said, “I can't give you anything, not even a scintilla, because it's not your business.”
Whom Brown might pick for his fourth appointment to the California Supreme Court and why he's waited—Werdegar announced her impending retirement in March 2017—has become a favorite, albeit mysterious, parlor game around the Capitol. At first, some thought the delay was meant to shield the nominee from having to appear on the November ballot. But the deadline for placing candidates on the ballot came and went on Aug. 30.
Others thought Brown was focused on the election and ensuring that Proposition 6, a measure to overturn a road-construction-funding gas tax, was defeated at the ballot box. But Brown still has not signalled that a pick is imminent. His term in office ends Jan. 7.
A parade of appellate court justices have served pro tem on the high court since Werdegar's departure. At least one of them, Third District Court of Appeal Justice Ronald Robie, has appeared on the bench three times in less than a year, according to Horvitz & Levy partner David Ettinger.
Brown on Wednesday called the pro-tem replacement process “very fair because you've given courts of appeal judges tryouts, and they get to go up there and sit [on the Supreme Court] and rule on a couple of cases. They find it a very rewarding experience, the court of appeals justices that I've talked to.”
Asked if the practice unfairly burdened courts of appeals, which temporarily lose a justice to Supreme Court work, Brown shrugged. “Some appellate courts work a lot faster than others,” he said.
Read more:
Nelson Mullins, Sidley Partners Among Latest 6 Brown Taps for Superior Court Seats
Two Top Aides to Gov. Brown Picked for Appellate Court Seats
Trio of Big Law Partners, Clerk for Judge Davila Among 33 Tapped for State Trial Bench
What's Taking Jerry Brown So Long to Pick a Supreme Court Justice?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/03/Apple-computer-sign-767x633.jpg)
Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute read![Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2023/04/Ninth_Circuit_Interior-7175-767x633.jpg)
Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee
![Devin Nunes, Former California GOP Congressman, Loses Move to Revive Defamation Suit Devin Nunes, Former California GOP Congressman, Loses Move to Revive Defamation Suit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/68/0b/a22e5060444290260ade65ac6e03/nunes-lizza-767x633.jpg)
Devin Nunes, Former California GOP Congressman, Loses Move to Revive Defamation Suit
6 minute read![Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/therecorder/contrib/content/uploads/sites/400/2023/02/Bad-Spaniels-Jack-Daniel-767x633.jpg)
Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250